Do you want to fight the war on terrorists on foreign soil or American soil? Those are your only two choices!

Question

I keep seeing posts on this board demanding a withdrawal and our own (liberal) Congress is trying to require a "pull-out" date against the CinC's wishes and the advice if military leaders. Do you people want to fight terrorists on foreign soil or on American soil? Those are your only two choices. Their intent to "Kill All Infidels!" is about as clear a message as you'll ever receive from an enemy!

Choose wisely, and remember, not fighting them IS NOT A CHOICE! I can't imagine a more simple "black & white" choice to make.

I vote for fighting them on their own soil or the soil of the country that's harboring them!

WHAT SAY YOU?

Those ARE the only two choices. And they don't have to have a military invasion to succeed (you people really have dismissed 9/11 haven't you?) A dirty bomb would do very nicely. And I'm not the one who thinks they want to "KILL ALL INFIDELS!" That's what they say, verbatim! Do you think they're joking? I don't want to wait around and find out, "Oh crap, they were serious!" We are at war! Agree or disagree with the reasons all you like but we are at war. Now, do you want to win or not? BTW, I agree that money could be better spent on securing our borders. Geez, common sense dictates that ALL U.S. Borders should've been closed on 9/11 before noon. If you're being attacked from within, you should try to figure out who's here before you let anyone else in! I'm so glad my grandparents generation had the guts to fight. Otherwise I'd have to type this in German (or Japanese).

Answer 1

Yes the difference here is that when we fight them on their soil we can use more airsupport, artillery etc. because collateral damage is more of an option. If there was a battle in LA we would have to make absolutely sure to not harm even 1 of our own. ITS IMPOSSIBLE PEOPLE! We must fight them over there before it comes here, ill be pissed if these Jawas are the first enemy of the US who actually manages to bring a conflict to the streets of the United States. Seeing as that never happened before it would be a great accomplishment for them to even get here.

I wish the democrats would understand that while they fight for the houses of the Iraqis to be saved from Bombs that their own houses here at home are going to be next if we dont nip this in the bud!

Answer 2

Look, you can throw a temper-tantrum and scream "Those are the only two choices because I SAY SO." but that doesn't change reality.

Those are NOT the choices.

How are those rag tag folks going to get over here, with enough men and enough weaponry to seriously fight us?

That's simply absurd.

Their intent is not to kill all infidels -- they hate us, sure, but then we've given them a lot of reasons to do so. But they aren't interested in taking over America or trying to murder most of its citizens -- protest rhetoric notwithstanding.

They want control of their homelands -- not the world or the US.

That's just something that liars on hate radio and some freaks in Washington made up to scare people and fill them with hate.

It's called propaganda.

Capitalizing the word "CHOICE" does not change reality one whit.

You are buying lies.

That's what every reasoning human on the planet says.

Answer 3

I say get the he11 out of Iraq and stop frittering away our military and money on people who don't want us there.

I say, spend the money on our borders and our ports; police and FBI to tighten our ability to find those few who come into our country to do us ill.

I say that Bush went to war for the oilfields.. Iraq had nothing to do with the WTC and Saddam wouldn't allow Al Queda and others in his country. I say that we should have stayed in Afghanistan (where the terrorists have trained for 25 years - and where they are regrouping)..If we had, we probably would have put an end to bin Ladin and his bunch.

If you do any research, you would read that Cheney, Bush, Rummie, Rove and the rest were planning the invasion of Iraq BEFORE 9/11 ever happened. They built an elaborate scheme of lies they were going to feed the American people. 9/11 just slowed them down for a while. It was ALWAYS Bushes aim to get control of Husseins oilfields. That is all they want..they don't give a tinkers dam about the Iraqi's or we, the people.......

Answer 4

What do you mean when you talk about fighting them on American soil? Are you suggesting Al-Qu'eda fighters are going to be paradropped into Washington DC the moment American troops leave Iraq? Will they storm beaches in the continental US? Are you suggesting that these people have any hope of forming an army actually invading? If so, how does remaining in Iraq stop this happening?

Terrorists don't have 'their own soil'. They control precisely ZERO governments. Al-Qu'aeda is an underground movement. You can't fight terrorism with the military.

You're not making much sense.

Answer 5

the wise choice, there, Junior, was to have spent the money, lives and resources in the CORRECT countries in the FIRST PLACE.

by invading Iraq, Bush has created more terrorists and hatred in the Islamic world. If he had acted wisely and taken out the Taliban COMPLETELY, which would have meant (inavding Pakistan along with Afghanistan) instead of dropping the focus on the real culprits and getting bogged down in the unwinnable war in Iraq, we would have dismantled Al Qeda's entire apparatus and Osama Bin Laden would have seen the business end of the American people's revenge...instead...he's as free as you or I.
The war in Iraq has NOTHING TO DO WITH TERRORISTS.

it's been proven now a million times...accept it.

Answer 6

You aren't fighting anything. It's not a either or. Are you so ignorant to think if terrorists wanted to strike they would hesitate because we're getting annihilated in Iraq? I am a former Marine that fought so that knuckleheads like you can feel strongly about something just for the sake of feeling strongly about something in this country. There is no such thing as security in the world. Deal with life little buddy.

Answer 7

Exactly. But the libs don't look at it that way. They prefer to run off to the beach and hide their heads in the sand in hopes the problem will go away-which it won't. It looks like the enemy is going to have to hurt us again ala 9-11 or much worse before anyone will be able to move these people off the tea and crumpet circuit or off the beach and away from the keg. It is truly amazing that folks can't or won't see the dangers right in front of their face. Talk about a state of denial!! They won't believe it until the cleaver is buried halfway into their sculls. I guess thats what they call natural selection. Too bad they have to take their kids with them on their head trip.

Answer 8

Both "soils". It's the only option. If they sneak into the country, or if they form within this country, you have to find them. The best way to end the war on terror is to stop pissing people off by occupying their land and stop trying to dominate them economically by using military force. Also, stop brutalizing them as if it were no big deal. Then they'll have no reason to blow themselves up around us.

Answer 9

How about if we don't allow them on American soil? Isn't that an option? Seems to me the money we've spent on Iraq could have went a long way to securing our borders and ports, and wouldn't have resulted in over 3,000 American lives lost.

Answer 10

Get real those people that "attacked " America were living in America. If people that are a citizen of a country and they don't like America are you saying that country is harboring the. Then looking at that situation maybe America should attack its self.