President Bush has decided to spent every dime are country has to offer in support of a lost war effort in a country that hates america and all we stand for. This President does not seem to understand that the american people want us out of Iraq and him out of office along with his republican cronies. Is it so much to ask that we as a nation try to help our own people instead of throwing good money after bad money supporting an incompetent war effort that is killing our young men and women? We as a nation will not forget the unwarrantable sacrifice of our men and women in uniform come election day in 2008.
2007-03-23 07:38:55 · 8 answers · asked by Kevin N 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Because it is money that won't go into the pockets of Bush and his cronies. In Bush's eyes, money spent on senseless war where over 2000 men and women have been killed is a good thing because eventually it will find it's way into Bush and Cheney's coffers.
Bush is upset because people (Congress) are actually rebelling against the "decider". Like the spoiled rich kid he is, Bush will throw a tantrum when he doesn't get his way.
2007-03-23 07:49:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
properly, as a "real looking" patriot then you certainly might desire to "comprehend" that the Earth is administered on fossil fuels, a finite substance, and no "real looking possibilities have been discovered. Nasa is going decrease back to the moon in ten years and then to Mars. Do you think of that extending the life span of the human race, and in doing so making the U.S. (the only us of a to land on yet another celestial physique) the financial frontrunner is unintelligent? till this question is purely a thoughtless rant you will possibly desire to additionally "comprehend" that fairly extra is performed at Nasa than "accumulating comet dirt." in the process history technologies has been developed via, and for the purpose of, defense force endeavors. Nasa is between the only greatest non-defense force companies that does independant analyze. And in case you somewhat are a "patriot" then you certainly certainly does no longer be detrimental to staying previous to different countries interior the sphere of technologies (wherein we are begginning to fall at the back of). reducing NASA, in value selection or in that's entirety is one step closer to Globalization, that's no longer us of a. the belief OF reducing NASA IS UNAMERICAN!!
2016-10-20 07:23:58 · answer #2 · answered by goodgion 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Huh, the US budget is around 2.6 trillions dollars and were averaging about 100 billion a year on the war. How does 3.8% of the budget equate to "every dime are (our) country has to offer?"
2007-03-23 08:12:13 · answer #3 · answered by dsl67 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Spare me. Where have the Democraps offered to spend anything on US instead of some liberal special interest project they can get rich on?? They're all too busy with the witch hunt, and weakening the nation.
2007-03-23 07:50:03 · answer #4 · answered by Dave 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
And hence why the Dems want them back before the elections, should they stand the snowballs chance in hell and actually pull out a win in the elections, they have in no way the balls or staying power it takes to run and win a war!
2007-03-23 07:43:48 · answer #5 · answered by J S 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush is an *** - but then, it IS America's fault that Irag hates us, let's think about that for a minute. If we walk out now, they'll be in even worse shape. Frankly, there is no longer a right or wrong in this - we're too involved. This country has to be stable or else the new leader will come after us.
2007-03-23 07:42:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
Bush keeps forgetting that Congress is a co-equal branch of government, and the only branch empowered by the Constituition to allocated federal funding.
2007-03-23 07:42:11 · answer #7 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
God knows.
2007-03-27 04:56:21 · answer #8 · answered by Shady Hazem 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋