Is Building #7 of the WTC the "smoking gun" that proves that 9/11 was an inside job?

Question

Most people are only aware that the twins fell on 9/11, but, in fact, building # 7 of the WTC fell as well - even though it was not struck by a plane.

BLG 7 was a 47 story steel structure, and though it was struck by some debris from one of the twins, it did not sustain enogh damege to bring it down - accourding to the experts.

Also, BLG 7 did not just collapse, it was demollitioned. How were they able to get the demolitions placed in there in roughly four hours, when everyone knows a building demo takes weeks to plan?

Go to www.youtube.com and type in "building 7" and you'll get all kinds of videos that reveal what I am saying from all the news sources...

Is this the smoking gun?

Do not answer if you have not reveiwed the evidence.

For those who are very interested in this topic, here are some FREE GOOGLE VIDEOS that I recommend you watch:

"9/11 Press for Truth"

"9/11 Revisited"

"The Road to Tyranny"

Answer 1

Nobody who believes the official story of 9/11 will say that wtc7 was blown up because then they would have to take a better look at the twin towers coming down. The planes hitting the towers isn't really what made people in awe,it was crazy,but when they collapsed that's what was most devastating. Most people on either side already have their minds made up,the only difference is we know both sides,and they wont listen to a second of it. The best thing to do is just keep on asking questions and hopefully wake someone else up. I kind of don't blame people to for not wanting to know its scary.

Answer 2

Loss of structural integrity was likely a result of weakening caused by fires on the 5th to 7th floors. The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyzes are needed to resolve this issue. [Ch. 5, p. 31.]

Despite FEMA's preliminary finding that fire caused the collapse, conspiracy theorists believe the collapse was the result of a controlled demolition, a belief usually accompanied by other 9/11 conspiracy theories. When asked about controlled demolition theories, Dr. Sunder said, "We consulted 80 public-sector experts and 125 private-sector experts. It is a Who’s Who of experts. People look for other solutions. As scientists, we can’t worry about that. Facts are facts."[11] In answer to the question of whether "a controlled[-]demolition hypothesis is being considered to explain the collapse", NIST said that, "[w]hile NIST has found no evidence of a blast or controlled demolition event, it would like to determine the magnitude of hypothetical blast scenarios that could have led to the structural failure of one or more critical elements."[7]

Answer 3

This is written by a so called " Liberal Democrat......

I've heard some interesting, some crazy, and some just plain weird conspiracy theories before but....

lately I've keep hearing this conspiracy theory about President Bush that he was behind the 9/11 attacks
so that he would have an excuse to invade Afganistan.

So my question is.... does anyone actually believe this C+ college student, who has difficulty pronouncing
every 5th word, somehow engineered the crime of the century, and in addition to that got at least 10-20
other like minded conservative religious republicans people to go along with it , killing 3,000+ Americans,
cost his own country hundreds of Billions, all so he would have an excuse to invade a country that has
absolutely nothing (not even oil), but dirt and a bunch of poor muslims? (Afganistan) .
And in addition to above, he did it so well that no evidence exists, just a bunch of conspiracy therories.

Now really, does this make any sense what-so-ever?

I keep asking you conspiracy theorists this question, but NONE of you has bothered to answer.
What makes *you* think you're immune from the govt? Certainly a govt who would slaughter
3000 people just for showing up at work one day would NOT hesitiate to kill anyone who tried to
speak out against it.....YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS!
OOOOOOO...Look out....you're next!!

Answer 4

I think so. Shoot, the way the twin towers came down looked more like demolition than a corner of a building becoming SO hot from jet fuel, that it waited for the other three corners to "catch up" before crashing down.

Answer 5

Ok, so the government hired 19 people to destroy this building but they were so retarted that accidentally flew into the two giant towers rather than hit that one? The other one was in the wrong town altogether? I know terrorists are retarted, but that's really really bad.

Answer 6

I think you'd have to be nuts to believe these conspiracy theories. Its basic physics and structural engineering. Structural damage from falling debris and from fires burning for over 7 hours caused WTC 7 to collapse.

See the Popular Mechanics debunking of conspiracy theories.

Answer 7

Keep digging...the evidence you're looking for is buried 30 yards north of the Roswell crash site.

Answer 8

I believe, along with you, that a sabatoge may have occurred. I DO NOT trust our government under George Bush one tiny bit. He does everything in his power to get the exact results he wants, ignoring all logic. I've yet to view the videos, but I definitely have an open mind.

Answer 9

Take a chlorine bath it will be better in the morning

Answer 10

No, go back under your rock until the next conspiracy comes up.