2007-03-23 06:33:28 · 18 answers · asked by JP 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Because everytime liberals ask this question they provide no proof of crimes that our politicians have voted for and commited.... but please do provide proof.
2007-03-23 06:38:50 · answer #1 · answered by Barack O Bankrupt 4 · 6⤊ 1⤋
President Bush did what Neville Chamberlain and President Roosevelt should have done, but didn't, in 1938.
Your ilk would have been demanding the scalps of FDR and Chamberlain for their "crime" in bringing down Hitler. You'd be telling us that there were no WMD in Germany and that the Nazis would have been a lot better than what came after.
But if Chamberlain and Roosevelt had done in 1938 what Bush did in 2003, fifty millions would not have died, who did die. History will give Bush credit for this, even if you will not.
2007-03-23 13:49:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anne Marie 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Dont worry about the general population. Look at congress, the dems own the house and senate so you know if they had even 1 credible accusation against him, or could in ANY way find a law he broke they would nail him to the cross.
That in itself is proof that Bush has commited no such crimes. Is it a conspiracy in the democratic house and senate to let Bush slide? Get real people.
2007-03-23 13:38:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Hey SHOOTERS, What rock did you crawl out from under?
>>>>Looks like you are in the vast minority. <<<
How can someone who hates the chimp be in a minority? Have you seen his poll numbers lately? I hate to break it to you, but about 70% of the country have quit drinking their Kool-Aid!
>>>Imagine Iraq, Iran, and North Korea if Kerry or Gore got in office<<<.
How about if you imagine 3500 American boys and girls still alive! Imagine that the World Trade Center is still standing because Gore was reading the intelligence reports and not in Crawford Texas on vacation. You bunch of morons deserve an idiot to lead you to the gates of hell.
2007-03-23 14:01:07 · answer #4 · answered by sniffels323 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because they refuse to read the laws in question, and don't believe that the US Supreme Court has any authority to determine when federal laws are broken.
Some of them are just in that much denial of the reality.
As you can see from many of the posts above. They've never read the laws or the case holdings, and just cling to their arbitrary blind faith that's spoon-fed to them by the pundits.
Others think that it doesn't matter what laws Bush has broken on the books, becuase the laws should not apply to Bush. Either because of his position, or because he claimed to have good intentions. While those may be valid affirmative justifications for breaking the law (like self defense), it doesn't change the fact that the law was still broken. It just changes whether he can be punished for it or not.
2007-03-23 13:49:00 · answer #5 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Looks like you are in the vast minority. I guess you "think" he has committed crimes, but in fact, you are just angry he is President and not Gore or Kerry.
Imagine Iraq, Iran, and North Korea if Kerry or Gore got in office.
2007-03-23 13:42:27 · answer #6 · answered by SHOOTER586 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The same old saw. On and on and on... it never ends, the same c--p! There are no crimes so get over it. Move On should stand for what you guys should do instead of that inane Democratic support group.
2007-03-23 13:46:16 · answer #7 · answered by canela 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You're right, removing a dictator that killed millions of his own people from power and having the first elections in that country. Wow, we should punich his crimes right now
2007-03-23 13:39:15 · answer #8 · answered by ladywildfireok 3 · 6⤊ 1⤋
They deserve what's coming to them, sadly. They will never wake up, and when they do it will be far too late. All they need to do is get involved and do the research. It's disgusting, but our soldiers are even more disgusting. They should've done a little more research before they decided to go to another country and kill innocent people that had nothing to do with nine eleven. I would be over there fighting right now, but it's so f'ed in more than one way. It's so much bigger than one man, you need to realize that.
2007-03-23 13:41:18 · answer #9 · answered by jonjroberts 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Uh, because he hasn't??? Or are you talking about these crimes and atrocities??
http://home.comcast.net/~stoptheliberallies/AtrocitiesinIraq.pps
2007-03-23 13:40:49 · answer #10 · answered by Sane 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋