When pigs fly!! Obama is a fraud and so is Hillary Rotten.
2007-03-23 06:06:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Yankee Dude 6
·
9⤊
5⤋
Are you taking a poll so you can jump on the bandwagon of whoever is most popular? If so you should pay attention to the candidates and hear what they say. See how they react to things. Notice who is supporting them. Make up your own mind.
Both of the candidates you mention are good speakers. Mr. Obama has charisma which helps him convey his message a little easier. Ms. Clinton has more experience as she has been in the Senate longer than Mr. Obama has. Currently either has as much chance as anyone of getting their party's nomination. As time goes on we will see things develop as more candidates come and go. There will be fund raising. The estimate is that the 2008 election will be the most expensive ever with an estimated cost of 1 Billion dollars.
Both of them have detractors who hate them just because of their names or because of his color and her gender. Some don't like her because of her husband, who by the way is still extremely popular.
2007-03-23 06:49:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
WOW! What might desire to be reported? This has the makings of a extensive feud that would desire to prefer to very final for a real looking mutually as. Seeing Flanders beat the Mayor to a pulp with the sledge hammer hurted even questioning approximately it. I certainly have some concepts now which will now fairly plenty make up lots of the suits for my fantasy Wrestlemania coach which u will see contained interior the advent weeks. sounds like Grover has somebody else to think of of approximately as properly Kool help guy. And the womrn's gauntlet sounds great. a impressive interest.
2016-10-20 07:16:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
"In a 2005 post on the liberal weblog Daily Kos, Barack Obama argued that Democrats must not only try to defeat the Republicans, they must work to build trust in government: "The bottom line is that our job is harder than the conservatives' job...whenever we exaggerate or demonize, or oversimplify or overstate our case, we lose. Whenever we dumb down the political debate, we lose. A polarized electorate that is turned off of politics, and easily dismisses both parties because of the nasty, dishonest tone of the debate, works perfectly well for those who seek to chip away at the very idea of government because, in the end, a cynical electorate is a selfish electorate."
Obama's campaign for President is built on the premise that the Democrats must "disagree without being disagreeable" and unite America to solve issues of historic importance. He focuses on his ability to overcome partisan bickering, to work across the aisle, and to produce real results. The idea that someone would be able to unite America and get the government to productively work on important issues sounds idealistic. Understanding that cynicism, Obama stresses that Americans must embrace the 'audacity of hope.' Hope is an irrational belief, a faith in optimism, but hope is also a unifying emotion, one that resonates with people across the globe. By emphasizing that we should all believe in the possibility of a new type of politics, Obama has converted many people, including Republicans, to believe in the possibility of the anti-Bush, a non-ideological leader that respects those who disagree with him and works to find not the Democratic solution, not the Republican solution, but the best solution. Campaigning to replace Bush with a unifying leader, he has struck a chord across the country—as shown by polls, book sales, enormous crowds, and website groups. In this crucial juncture in history, he has the potential to improve how Americans perceive politics, leading to more trust in government and solving some very difficult problems.
All of the Democratic candidates more or less support the same issues and hold similar values. The candidate's Iraq plans, health care plans, energy plans, ethics plans, and education plans differ in details, but they all aim for the same general progressive goals: pulling out of Iraq, introducing universal health care, reducing America’s dependence on oil, battling climate change, strengthening national security, ridding Washington of corruption, and improving our schools. The specific details of the plans aren’t too significant; what matters more is the actual ability of the candidate to create the political will for change. Obama, unlike the most of the other candidates, has a history of working across the aisle and listening to opposing viewpoints, and is stressing a united America within his campaign. If he was elected, Obama would do a better job of not only passing the necessary legislation by incorporating other peoples points of view, but also persuading the American people that he is acting in their interest. An American president who is elected by saying, ‘we’re all in this together and we all have a stake in each other’ will do a better job of persuading Republican voters that America is moving in the right direction. If Obama’s nomination fails, another Democratic may be able to win the presidency, but the Republican voters would not respect— four out of ten Republicans voted for Obama in his Illinois Senate Race —the other Democratic candidate as much Obama. Because of his ability to appeal to moderate and Republican voters, an Obama election will improve the long-term image of the Democratic Party. We don't want another Bush...Ever."
http://www.obamapedia.org/page/Why+should+I+vote+for+Barack+Obama+in+2008%3F
Also see: http://www.obamapedia.org/page/Does+Barack+Obama+have+enough+experience+to+be+president%3F
2007-03-26 02:59:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jake B 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Barack should win over Hilary, but I'd prefer neither. I think he's got good views and if a Democrat wins I want it to be him, but he gets a lot of appeal from his ethnicity. He's the most conservative of the Democrats and I like that, but I still think that the only reason that the Republicans are behind is because of Dubya and the occupation of Iraq.
2007-03-23 06:06:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Barack Obama is simply a tool of the DNC, being pushed to the forefront so they can use their famous Race Card whenever anybody dares to criticize Democratic policies.
Unfortunately, Obama, while having good intentions, is too stupid to realize he's just a puppet for Howard Dean.
In the end, Hillary will get the nomination. She has already engaged in a ruthless smear campaign of Obama, as he is a viable threat to her dreams of tyranny.
2007-03-23 06:26:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by wheresdean 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
I am in support of Hillary Clinton. I like Obama, but I am one of those who just can't deal with his inexperience and naivte about political matters. I hope to see him as her running mate though, that is the dream ticket for '08.
2007-03-23 06:18:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Very sharp and smooth talker, too liberal for me. Also very limited expirience. He's the typical Democratic pretty boy, kind of like Gary Hart. Where he stands on the issues is not where I stand.
2007-03-23 07:48:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Den 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
I like Obama, as he is the only person I have heard who admits that Washingotn is completely screwed up and is willing to fix it.
2007-03-23 06:25:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Oh this is easy:
Go to: http://origin.barackobama.com/issues/
and http://www.barackobama.com/
and when you're finish your research go to:
http://www.hillaryclinton.com/?splash=1 (Bill Cinton is making a PLEA for you to vote for his wife)....
and http://www.hillaryclinton.com/about/
And see which one is more qualified to run a state nevertheless a country.
Where do I pick up my prize?
2007-03-23 06:27:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by Stealth 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
What have either of them ever done in the past that resulted in being beneficial for the country? Absolutely nothing.
Neither one of them should win.
2007-03-23 06:01:22
·
answer #11
·
answered by Emma 6
·
0⤊
4⤋