2007-03-23 05:00:23 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The final solution is to put enough soldiers on the ground, in the streets so that we can deter violence long enough to win hearts and minds in the communities. By the time we lighten up the presence and the militias/insurgents/terrorists come back to the surface, the people will no longer want them there and prefer to live in peace. That's the solution. We have only been doing that on a small scale. Now is our chance, with this surge, to make it happen all over Baghdad. It does work. I've been able to do it in my area of Baghdad with great success.
When it's all said and done, we can complete the peace enforcing part of this war and be a complete success.
2007-03-23 05:03:05 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Winning in Iraq, give me a break nobody can win this kinda war with terrorists I am sorry to say. Terrorism will be with us for many future generations. The goal we can set is bringing our troops home. Let the Iraq government take control since terrorists will always strike in IRAQ you cannot eliminate them I am sorry. This War is unlike any other war you don't know what will happen and where because someone is always blowing themselves up. Detering terrorism is the only thing we can do.
2007-03-23 05:12:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
We have no defined agenda that I've ever seen, and no finish line. The concept of "winning" and "loosing" is meaningless.
We can declare victory at any time, because we're the only ones drawing the finish line.
If the goal is to end all conflict in Iraq or the region, that's never going to happen. At least not for many decades.
If the goal is to create new Iraqi govt, that's already done.
So, the goal has to be to do something else, but Bush refuses to set forth any goals, time-tables, plans, schedules, or anything that could be used to measure progress.
"Stay the course" means nothing unless the course is defined and the objectives are measurable. So, by his definition, we are there indefinitely, until someone else makes a decision.
2007-03-23 05:03:51 · answer #3 · answered by coragryph 7 · 5⤊ 3⤋
the end goal really is to liberate iraq and take out the terrorists, but that would be and amazing feet to do becuase torrorism is everywhere, we are not winning in the war, the casulties are enormus and we aren't getting any support form other countries, i dont know if the us can pull this off and especially before the next elections and the new president is in the white house, hopefully obama
2007-03-23 05:06:28 · answer #4 · answered by horsemen 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
lets see, we succeeded in ridding the earth of one of the most evil dictators in history, have captured or killed several key terrorists, have broken up plans for future terrorist attacks, there has not been one terrorists attack on the US since 9/11, and we have done all this while the liberals have being trying to get us defeated along every step of the way. (except in the beginning, when they approved the war)
2007-03-23 05:26:16 · answer #5 · answered by Wizard of Ahhs 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They are winning by Cheney talking tough. The end goal is to stroke Bush's ego.
2007-03-23 05:03:12 · answer #6 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
That is why the libs are unqualified- 4 years of war- and you still don't get it.
2007-03-23 05:27:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Saddam is out of power - many key terrorist leaders have been captured or killed. Security.
2007-03-23 05:04:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
As the oil is no more sold to the chinese neither the french people, the US is winning...
2007-03-23 05:06:53 · answer #9 · answered by Thom Jefferson 1 · 0⤊ 3⤋
We gots the oilz. Skrew evry thig else.
2007-03-23 05:08:30 · answer #10 · answered by prole1984 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋