Why do at least 80% of right wing contributors on Yahoo sites seem mentally challenged ?

Question

Faulty logic, frequent spelling mistakes, shoddy grammar..... All are trademarks of the politically conservative Yahoo contributor. Do red states have schools ? Maybe 7-11 allows for their employees to have internet breaks like other firms have smoke of coffee breaks.

Answer 1

Not so much as mentally challenged as poorly educated because there are not enough funds for schools. It is for the war, you know. Most are mean spirited because of the idiots on conservative hate radio and the clap trap they spew. The cons pick up on that stuff and repeat it. Maybe they can't talk real issues because hate radio doesn't talk real issues. Besides they would lose big time if they did. So they resort to the kind of lame questions you see from them. The Libs do some of the same, I have noticed, but not as much.

Answer 2

I think you need to look in the mirror on this one. Where is your logic on this matter? At least 80%? What hole in the ground did you pull this number out of? Since when is someone mentally challenged simply because they aren't good at composition.

The issue isn't with conservatives doing this, it is that those on the internet tend to be lazy. We are so used to abreviating words and phrases, a lot of people out there just don't take the time to actually right everything out and then check it over.

Mentally challenged would be those liberals that just spout out what the news tells them. Generally, conservatives tend to research things much more thoroughly due to the fact that the media is liberally biased and therefore to we have to look else where to come up with our own view on a subject/issue.

Answer 3

Its real interesting to see this since the majority of the libs that the media reports on, especially the Hollywood down with America crowd, have no education outside of acting school and can't talk their way out of paper bag without a script. From my knowledge of conservatives many have more education, higher grade points, and from better schools than you can even dream of. Most of us on a site like this are not putting together a doctoral thesis. We try to put general ideas down and move on to another issue. I went back on line and read through some of your other libs questions and answers - I didn't know Wal Mart was back in the education business. They don't look like Rhodes Scholars to me.

Answer 4

i'm an atheist. whether, i don't think religious human beings are mentally challenged, I do exactly not consider them. Theres a lot of loopy recommendations and religions obtainable. yet i think of the religion supplies human beings faith and a feeling of wish that there is a divine power and that they are actually not on my own. a lot of human beings think of atheists or any godless individual are irrational and moronic. Its a count ofopinion quite than certainty. all people could have faith in what they like to, yet there'll continuously be human beings forcing religions on others or believing their way is "the ultimate way."

Answer 5

I wonder why 90% of the left wing contributors to Yahoo sites opt for personal attacks on others...rather than honestly debating the issues of the day.

Answer 6

You did a scientific survey to come up with the 80%. You libs won't debate real issue. You just bash bush. I say 95% of the libs do nothing but bash bush.

Answer 7

I don't know but maybe it's the same reason that 90% of left wing contributors seem, mentally challenged. Just a guess.

Answer 8

You sound far worse than the people you describe!!!!

Are you considering burning books?

Tearing up the right to free speech?

People who cannot tolerate others opinions and debate them intelligently are missing more than a few brain cells!!!!

Answer 9

Maybe if schools would start teaching instead of just trying to spread secular progressive propoganda, people would be smarter

Answer 10

i would say that 80% of ALL contributors would fall into that category.

ignorance is a bipartisan problem.