English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Let's see, between Gingrich, Giuliani, and McCain they have almost enough wives (current and ex) to make up a baseball team. On the other hand, the Democratic Presidential candidates are in long term marriages with the same partner. Who really has family values?

2007-03-23 03:39:49 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

26 answers

divorce vs. concaine.....besides I like baseball

2007-03-23 03:43:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I agree I keep hearing that also about family values. They are the most corrupt politicians ever in office. They lie and send over 3000 young Americans to their death. While they cling to "well, we are agaisnt abortion" Isn't everybody?
Democrats included? They have to be against something everyone else is to sound respectable and those few single girls that may get an abortion seems like a good target. Since most don't vote. They are like TV Evangelists who live like kings on other peoples money while saying be good never saying what good is. Don't want to offend anyone.
Also I hear about those coward Democrates who won't fight for their country but most of the men over in Iraq when I was there were Democrats. Rich people don't go to war they just call wars to gain something and send poor boys to fight.
they are use to having others do nasty jobs for them and feel it is their birth right. If some die well they are just slaves anyway and their lives are really not that important.
One general even said "well this is one way to get rid of the poor people."
The way I see it when I was there it is a war between two radical muslim extremists who hate Americans. They hate each other worst than they hate us. But by keeping a civil war going furnishing them with training and weapons. We are getting rid of most of the muslims.
So negotiateing over there should be easier in the future.
After them coming out of an 8 year war with Iran. This definitely keeps them in poverty and keeps the population down.

2007-03-23 10:50:10 · answer #2 · answered by Steven 6 · 0 0

Well, what about Bill Clinton and his oval office experiences with an intern named Monica Lewinski? Was cheating on his wife not considered poor family values. And what about John Kerry and how he mooches off of his wife because she's wealthy? You see, this can go both ways you know.

2007-03-23 10:48:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's an interesting set of dynamics because it is primarily the conservative candidates who are promoting the issue of 'moral degradation' in society. But in reality, Mr. Giuliani ended his marriage in a very ugly, and public manner. I think that people should really evaluate these candidates with open eyes and not just with their political rhetoric. good question!

2007-03-23 10:44:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Why does it matter to you? If made to choice between a divorced man who will protect America, lower taxes, appoint Conservative judges, and who may occasionally wear a dress, as opposed to one who will ignore terrorists threats raise taxes, appoint judges hostile to common sense, and who has stayed married to the same woman for 30 years, I'll take the cross dresser any day

2007-03-23 10:47:56 · answer #5 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 1 0

The side which promotes life instead of abortion. The side that votes that marrige is between a man and a woman. The side that promotes families being involved in their children's education, not keeping the parents uninformed (like the Dimocrats do.)

2007-03-23 10:46:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Please there really is no comparison between these gentleman on the (alleged) right, with any of the spineless jellyfish the left has to offer.....I guess, according to the left, family values equates to not only disgracing your wife with numerous public affairs and rape scandals, but ALSO besmirching the Noble office of Commander and Chief and the United States of America?

2007-03-23 10:46:58 · answer #7 · answered by CrazyCatLady 4 · 1 1

So, you're going to base your decision on who should run the country by the number of divorces they've had?

I don't care what your political persuasion is, marriages don't always work. It has nothing to do with family values.

2007-03-23 10:45:16 · answer #8 · answered by Gus K 3 · 4 0

well neither
i still recall how Mr Clinton acted in the white house
although some say that he did that because his wife is not interested but still he can play some were else not in office
that was the story about CliNTon but it was nt the first or the last of demo crates

2007-03-23 10:45:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Just because someone has family values does not mean they would be able to efficiently run a country.

2007-03-23 10:45:06 · answer #10 · answered by footballgrl 3 · 1 0

Family's values comes from mastering our creator's universal gifts of life with Success in worshiping God with self expression as the Son of God in planet of apes.
The blunders and slip-ups with human errors with total loss of our creator's universal gifts of life created the mess out there with failures and horrors in idol worshiping the dead Mummy from the graveyards of different ancestor's custom with failures in worshiping God with self expression as the Son of a dirty old man from the graveyards of ancestor's custom of the past in planet of apes.
Ever wonder why a dirty old men will always be a dirty old men in making a mess and monkey out of themselves in planet of apes.

2007-03-23 11:08:40 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers