That's not illegal. It may be dubious and malicious (nothing new for them) but not illegal.
I realize that the administration is more interested in investigating Democrats more than Republicans but that's just hypocrisy and that isn't a crime.
Why doesn't he just admit this and comply with the subpoenas so he can move on to screwing other things up?
2007-03-23 03:03:58 · 3 answers · asked by Rick 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
There is much more to this then Mr. Bush and Carl Rove want to see made public.....The Best Is Yet To Come...........look to the whistle blower....
2007-03-23 03:21:26 · answer #1 · answered by bodie 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you. Bush had the right to fire the attorneys for whatever reason he choose but congress has no right to subpoena his aids. There is still such a thing as separation of the powers.
I just do not understand why this is such a big deal when Clinton replaced all the the attorneys. One of which, from Little Rock was investigating whitewater.
2007-03-23 11:09:38 · answer #2 · answered by gerafalop 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if failing to do your job properly qualifies as being political. Not investigating voter fraud, not enforcing illegal immigration laws seems to be nothing to liberals. Now investigating Haliburton is the only thing they want investigated.
2007-03-23 10:10:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋