English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

No fear then? i thought they were open minded and would at least see what such climate scientists were saying
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4520665474899458831&q=the+great+global+warming+swindle&hl=en
http://www.smh.com.au/news/environment/scientists-have-inconvenient-news-for-gore/2007/03/13/1173722471286.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists_opposing_global_warming_consensus

2007-03-23 00:03:10 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

13th respondant, nice sources... and you expect me to believe you? WOW

2007-03-23 02:47:56 · update #1

24 answers

Well you obviously haven't done your research. The video documentary that you posted has already shown to be a fake. Basically the scientists on the show have already been shown to have falsely interpreted results. their research was not we conducted and the results were wrongly interpreted. To add to this a pro global warming scientist actually appears on the show and he has already complained that his views were completely misrepresented by selective editing on the part of channel four. Channel four have already broadcast an apology for the show. I guess it is your turn to get angry!

To add to this why has the Whitehouse got rid of scientists who actually agree that global warming is man made?

You want sources then here you go. Time to get you angry

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,,2032570,00.html

http://www.medialens.org/alerts/07/0313pure_propaganda_the.php

http://www.climal.com/the-great-global-warming-swindle.php

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,2031455,00.html

http://climatedenial.org/2007/03/09/the-great-channel-four-swindle/

http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/42188.html

http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2006Nov01/0,4670,GlobalWarming,00.html

Keep sticking your head in the sand mate! It must be a bit embarrassing using a film as your source, a film that has been debunked so many times since it was shown a few weeks ago, and indeed a film that forced a televised apology from its makers!

2007-03-23 00:19:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

The problem with these scientists is they do not represent the mainstream thinking and results gathered by the rest of the scientific community .

Mars is not getting hotter because you can not say that unless you have determined a base line .

Since it is difficult to accomplish here on earth it is impossible to accomplish on Mars .

This crap about the entire solar system is getting hotter is just a bunch of junk science .

We can prove right now right here today that according to the evidence that is irrefutable that Global warming is happening and we are contributing to it .

The difference between life and death my well hang on what we do today for future generations .


There is only so much carbon absorbed and stored by the eco system on planet earth .

That level is off the charts right now in comparrison with human development on earth . It may have been a lot hotter 25 million years ago but we did not live then .
So with human experience confined to the last say 125,000 years and ancestors that where much like us going back say 600,000 years ,our focus needs to be on the climate range during that period .

The time when man developed and roamed the planet . Taking information from any other period and saying well the earth was 20 degrees warmer 5 million years ago is worthless information cause no people lived during that time . Lets see the planet is 4-5 billion years old and I have a feeling you do not grasp this .That for a billion years the temperature on earth was 2000-3000 degrees guess you can say the planet was a lot warmer then . But no life .
Then over the course of another billion years the planet temperature dropped to around 1000-2000 degrees yet still no life as we know it then the planet cooled some more over the next billion years 100-1000 degrees And during the last billion or so years life began to pop up .
North and South America did not exist yet .

Are you getting the big picture now .

30,000 years ago man wondered the planet in small packs like wolfs do . Hunting and gathering and had not built a single home or fashioned more then stone tools .
Most of the time where a man/woman died is where they stayed . No grave diggers or shovels yet .
They may not tell you in school but waste not want not we ate the dead back then . How do you think all the cannibals all over the pacific Islands felt 1000 years ago as Christian men showed up on the island and killed the natives because they we sub human . Ate there own danced wildly in mating ceremonies more akin to an orgy .
Civilized man was shocked by the behavior of these animals that walked on two feet and communicated with one another and had developed rituals themselves where they ate the human body and drank the blood just different from Christian methods of wine and bread which they say is the boody and blood .
We have not come to far in the last 1000 years but we have been able to develop computer models and they say stop polluting the air jackash .

2007-03-23 07:41:43 · answer #2 · answered by trouble maker 3 · 1 1

its not a mad or sad thing Its science and evidence we need to see and global warming apparently is happening -I'm not a scientist but I do read. Its not a political view its just science man. There are many shades of opinion in science but global warming is pretty much accepted at this point world wide. Perhaps in many years we may have new information and change our conclusions But we have to work with what info we have now and we need to err on the side of caution.
One should consider who is paying the "there is no global warming" proponents.
You may recall that "scientists" employed by the tobacco companies claimed there were no dangers to tobacco use.
Isn't it something that a lot of people so angry about the concept that global warming is scientifically based sound a lot like the people in the old days that were incredulous and outraged to hear the world is round? Or that the Earth had to be the center of the solar system instead of the sun with us revolving around it?

2007-03-23 07:15:09 · answer #3 · answered by FoudaFaFa 5 · 0 1

No Such thing as Global Warming. There were no scientists back a 1000 years ago so how do we know that the same things didnt happen back then. Gore was/is wrong.

2007-03-23 08:05:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

OOOOOOOO the temp has risen a 1/300th of a degree and some fishermen fell into the lake while ice fishing when it was 50 degrees out. Global Warming is a fact! A fact of crap!!! I go with Common Sense everytime!!! You dont go out on a lake when its 50 outside and Global Warming is a joke!!!

Show me the hard evidence that it exists something more than 1/300th of a degree in 40 years. I'm not going to get my shorts in a bunch over that ok. Unlike most of the Left I need some hard Scientific evidence to show your findings to be true. Good thing your boy and academy award winner believes what he says. I'm glad to see he is willing to sign a contract to walk the walk shall I say. I'm also glad to see he still is chowin down the meat too. Go Gore Go nice job lefties nice job!!! Your all too funny!!!

2007-03-23 08:35:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

In my case, I want to know the truth. So, I listen to all other people who study objectively the issues. Then I try to make a sound judgement on what's the information presented. Only through debate of ideas can we, as a people, find the truth objectively. All theories have to be challenge in a debate process before action is taken. Remember its always better to have ideas than beliefs. Beliefs make you do irrational things.

As for the fringe, the loud vocal extreme groups of both parties are most of the times minorities. The mainstream people of any party like to hear all the information before they make up their mind on any issue. If you make up your mind before hearing the facts, then you better check your brain at the door.

2007-03-23 08:53:51 · answer #6 · answered by Laughing Man Copycat 5 · 1 1

Because no one like Al Gore would ever lie to promote their own agenda. Anyone on the left is not capable of lying to those lemmings.

2007-03-23 07:51:07 · answer #7 · answered by earl justice 3 · 0 0

Most who disagree work for the oil companies who have little concern for the global warming.

2007-03-23 07:59:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They're only Open-Mined wihen it comes to getting control of The white House. Anything that goes against that? Is utter nonsense to them.

2007-03-23 08:26:45 · answer #9 · answered by Nunya Bidniss 7 · 0 0

Because gore is not a scientist on anything. He's just a p----off wanna be,wanna be President,wanna be scientist,wanna be actor,he is what he is a nothing!

2007-03-23 07:10:52 · answer #10 · answered by Classic96 4 · 5 0

fedest.com, questions and answers