Or would it?
2007-03-22 23:40:14 · 6 answers · asked by Not so looney afterall 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
A female President will not fight for rights of women but will serve interests of the party that nominated her. She will rather fight for gays because of her liberal affiliation.
2007-03-22 23:44:03 · answer #1 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Well. maybe we could get 12 more paid sick days per year. (One per month, ladies)!
Honestly, I think a female president would set a good example to young girls and women that a woman is capeable of achieving the highest office in US politics.
2007-03-22 23:56:57 · answer #2 · answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't think women suffer from a lack of rights in the U.S.
2007-03-22 23:50:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hopefully a female President would look upon all of us the same. There are too many issues, that affect all of us, for us to continue to divide ourselves.
2007-03-22 23:45:33 · answer #4 · answered by LittleLamb 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Women already have more rights than men in the US. They already get preferential treatment.
Help womens rights in the US? How do you figure?
2007-03-22 23:57:15 · answer #5 · answered by Bryan _ 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well if she is republican, she would advance the rights of women democrats to criticize her and her administration. If she were democrat, she would do nothing but complain.
2007-03-22 23:49:26 · answer #6 · answered by canbarra 2 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋