For me, it's a toss-up!
2007-03-22 23:29:02 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
EB: "Cindy Sheehan has not consorted with the enemy" Yes as a matter of fact...she has: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10704025/
2007-03-22 23:53:31 · update #1
Pass the napalm please...I agree! Hands down it's Hanoi Jane, cindy is running a close second, hugging dictators around the globe!
2007-03-22 23:37:02 · answer #1 · answered by ShadowCat 6 · 7⤊ 1⤋
Hate is such a harsh word but between the two, I do not like Cindy Sheehan because she is a Lazy Incompetent And Reckless (my acronym for LIAR) person. What Sheehan is doing if she ever dared to attemp in some countries, she would be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
2007-03-23 09:23:19 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Knowledgeable VI 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
As a veteran of Viet Nam Jane Fonda hands down. I would put Hanoi John Kerry right behind Jane. His picture hangs in the Vietnamese War Hero museums right next to Janes. Cindy is just a usefull idiot of the Left.
2007-03-23 00:55:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Definitely Jane Fonda. Cindy Sheehan though I think she came a little unscrewed upstairs when she lost her son. (Understandable) She is now attacking Democrats for not pulling out of Iraq fast enough. She has the right to protest the war and is exercising that right.
Jane Fonda did not just protest the war, she went to the enemy, took PR pictures on their weapons,and turned in the names of American POWs that tried to slip her their social security numbers (so she could tell their families they were alive) into the North Vietnamese Camp Commander. causing them to be tortured. Jane Fonda is a traitor. Period. She does not deserve the right to live in the USA. If Count Acuman wants to try to put a crowbar in my A** for saying that, let him drop by and try. My address is on my 360 site. Funny how he is willing to use violence to stop violence, and only the people he agrees with have a right to speak out. Hypocrite
2007-03-22 23:51:37 · answer #4 · answered by mark g 6 · 6⤊ 1⤋
I don't hate anyone.
However, I DO hate what Cindy Sheehan does, and Jane Fonda is a disgrace. They're both traitors, as far as I'm concerned.
2007-03-23 00:36:05 · answer #5 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I hate Jane Fonda more, for my own reasons, but not the name she chose. Hanoi is a big city in North Viet Nam. Suddenly Hanoi was the capital of evil and Saigon was the capital of light. All the good people were expected to hike south the Ho Chi Minh trail to the good part and the bad were expected to leave their homes to go to the evil sector.
How were they supposed to know how an enemy had partitioned thier country?
2007-03-22 23:47:48 · answer #6 · answered by Chatty82 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Well Cindy Sheehan, lost her son and has decided to blame the government, at least her motives are sincere....
Jane Fonda is just an IDIOT!
So I'd have to say Jane Fonda...
2007-03-22 23:39:20 · answer #7 · answered by i_love_my_mp 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
ohhh man only one?
Hanoi Jane was on the verge of forgiveness after she apologized, but then proved her true colors, so i absolutely no respect for her.
Cindy sheehan has covered her self in the blood of a son she disowned and tarnishes his memory, which is why her husband left her.
Both women have gone to other countries to tell the world how horrible it is in the united states but yet they remain citizens...
its a hard call, only thing i could say is if they were both on fire and i had a fire extinguisher... I would have to think for a long time before I picked who to put out.... long time.... long... time...
2007-03-22 23:54:35 · answer #8 · answered by Stone K 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Hanoi Jane. Cindy Sheehan has not consorted with the enemy. She lost her son and protests the war. What Jane did was far worse.
2007-03-22 23:41:34 · answer #9 · answered by EB 2 · 3⤊ 4⤋
cindy sheehan. she is pure evil she is profiting off the death of her own son. she now charges (last i heard it was 5k an appearance) to come and speak at ani-war functions. she charges when she appears in interviews, it has even been hinted that she will run for office although i have heard no real proof of this. she is the truest form of evil. she is a wolf in sheep's clothing. she says she just wants people to remember her son yet she is making a fortune off her sons death. therefor she cannot possibly let go and move on from the death of her son because if she allowed herself to grieve and move on with her life then she would not be able to continue to use the death for political and capitol gains.
2007-03-23 01:13:01 · answer #10 · answered by big_john_719 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋