Is it aceptable to take another person's life?

Question

I am just about whteher people thinkt that it is aceptable to take another person life in one of the following situations.

terminal illness
abortion
war
self-defence
revenge killing
mercy killing
death penalty

any reason with evidence or facts would be greatly apprecitated i am investingatin this for my english coursework

thanks

Answer 1

We have the right to execute those who pose a threat to the lives of others.

When you let murderers go, you automatically condemn to death their next victim. That in itself is a death penalty, but instead of imposing it on a felon, you've imposed it on an innocent.

Answer 2

a million. Self defence. 2. protection of family participants. 3. protection of acquaintances. 4. to alleviate your person suffering while there is not any desire of alleviation and your suffering is insupportable. 5. In some situations that is optimal to help yet another to die, yet frequently it does no longer. I oppose capital punishment for the reason that errors have been made and harmless people have as a effect been killed by ability of the state. If it have been attainable to make beneficial the accused have been to blame, (no longer stability of danger yet actuality) then i might see much less clarification for the murderer to be spared, although notwithstanding in the event that they have been to blame, there could be good the explanation why they killed. the respond on your question isn't easy, i ought to pass on and on. people have debated this concern for some years. Killing isn't constantly incorrect, although, it incredibly is often undesirable, as there are frequently greater advantageous selections. . There are situations while i might kill without a 2d thought, yet it incredibly is genuine of many. (factors a million. 2. 3. notice.) There are different situations that would make me 'seek my sole'. or perhaps then i may be ambivalent. there is not any hassle-free answer to 3 questions, and none in any respect to others. by ability of ways, killing in self defence etc contain going against yet another's will and ending their existence. maximum assisted suicides do no longer likely prefer to die, they only prefer alleviation from their suffering and that would many times be extra approximately by ability of using the splendid palliative care. In different words, maximum assisted suicides are extremely pointless.

Answer 3

hiya well taking someones life who is terminally ill is otherwise known as euthnasia. It is legal but only if you take the situation to the courts first. Theres more about this law on the link below. One example of euthnasia that wasnt allowed by the court is the case of diane pretty here is a link below that describes the case.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/1971553.stm

Answer 4

You forgot defense of others.

Any sort of defense, whether it is self-defense or defense of others is that there has to be a threat of imminent danger, and the force applied does not exceed the force needed to repel.

Thus, if someone comes at you without a weapon, and you shoot him, the self defense defense may not serve at a complete defense, unless the dead person appeared ready to kill you, and would be able to kill you, without a weapon.

Answer 5

See the following sources for using lethal force in self defense.

Thank you, Signed,
Jerrad (Spark) Johnson.
Admin - www.ruger22c.com

Answer 6

Only in times of war and self defense.

Answer 7

I think only in self defense is taking anybody Else's live acceptable. The Bible tells us not to kill

Answer 8

Self defence, to protect your own life to keep from being killed.