I truly believe that Hilary Clinton will not win the nomination of the Demorcatic party. She's so scripted and just too political in everything she says and does. She'll have a quarter billion dollars to spend, but that still won't get her the nomination.
And Barrack Obama is a lightweight who won't be able to handle things when they get rough. He'll be gone in 6 months.
I had thought John Edwards would be the man, but after the recent unfortunate news about his wife's health, it may be that he is not able to go all the way.
So if these three frontrunners were to eventually drop out, who would likely be the democratic nominee?
2007-03-22 19:16:51 · 15 answers · asked by Zezo Zeze Zadfrack 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Al Gore
2007-03-22 22:18:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree that Dennis Kucinich would be good choice for president much as Adlai Stevenson would have made a good president. Neither, unfortunately, could get elected in this country. It's hard for me to imagine all of the Democratic front-runners dropping out, but if they do, the only person who would stand a chance of winning would be Al Gore.
I really don't know why anyone would want to be President of a country that had just slimed itself by allowing George W. Bush to be "elected" twice in a row with hardly a whimper, but then maybe the candidates see something I don't.
Incidently, Barrack Obama may be a lightweight, but, so far, he's handled himself like a pro.
2007-03-22 19:54:23 · answer #2 · answered by phoxee2003 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gov. Bill Richardson of New Mexico. He's a former UN Ambassador, and was used on many occasions in Iraq and in places like North Korea in negotiations with dictators. He is very intelligent, rational, and a man of good character. While he is Hispanic, he also is bilingual, and I'm sure he would make illegal immigration a primary issue in the campaign.
Lieberman has said he may switch parties as of March 21, 2007, as reported on CNN.
2007-03-22 19:25:19 · answer #3 · answered by gone 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Kucinich is a good choice for the Democratic nomination aside from Clinton, Obama and Edwards.
2007-03-22 19:23:08 · answer #4 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
AL GORE. Al Gore has drawn huge crowds all over the United States - even in such unlikely places as Idaho. I believe if given the opportunity he would make a great President.
2007-03-22 20:20:35 · answer #5 · answered by lovsnb2008 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Senator Biden is a possibility. (Delaware) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Biden
Gov. Richardson has noble intentions but as a New Mexican I'm not sure he's ready for the office of president.
Personally I'd like to see some fresh meat...which is why I'm following Obama so closely.
2007-03-22 20:06:01 · answer #6 · answered by sheeboobles 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rosie O'Donnell
2007-03-22 19:47:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Go ahead and shoot me if my opinion is inconvenient.
History doesn't have to repeat its self, but it can.
If nothing else it sets a precedent. Bad pun.
Kennedy (Nixon concedes) then Nixon.
Bush (Gory court story) then Gore?
At least it would be ironic.
2007-03-22 19:44:24 · answer #8 · answered by Wonka 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like Tom Vilsack's energy independence platform.
And Obama is not a light weight.
2007-03-22 19:26:19 · answer #9 · answered by Where Yat 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
last time I looked... Bill Richardson was around the fourth place I think...
he's probably got more experience than any of them... but he's got a lot of road between him and the ones you mention...
but it's a long way until Nov. of 08... so anything is possible...
2007-03-22 19:22:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋