I am doing a report for school and want to include this informal poll. Go ahead be honest and tell me how you feel.
Best answer the one that supports my thesis.
2007-03-22 18:53:55 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
yes, (this is how babies are made. shhhh)
2007-03-23 04:15:30 · answer #1 · answered by Proud Mama of 4 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think it's best that children have two parents... each parent has a lot to contribute to how that child is raised and it's values, personality, etc. If for some reason, one of the parents is neglectful, abusive, or in any way unfit to be a parent, than the child is better off with only one parent, that can provide for the child, care for it, and raise it properly. So yes, many children who grow up to be successful have only one parent, either because one dies, or one leaves, etc. Is it fully possible to only have one parent and be fine (my dad left when i was 2 and i am highly successful today and have no emotional or any other personal issues). But even I suggest that if possible, the child should have 2 parents just for that all around support the child would recieve.
2007-03-23 02:16:57 · answer #2 · answered by lynn 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Children do not need two parents as long as the parent that they do have has the support of family behind them, Like grandma and grandpa and aunts and uncles and neighbors. I had my boys young and I wouldn't have them today if it wasn't for my parents and brothers support. When I was 19 and on my own with no support and going out with a jerk, I gave my daughter up for adoption because I felt it was my only option at the time. I wasn't with my family at that time either, so only one parent and lots of support. My boys are responsible and caring little ones. They are never horrible but they are dolls and well-behaved. Some single parents have trouble because they have noone to turn to, and it's the kids that turn out bad.
2007-03-23 02:04:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, in my opinion, children do need a healthy, positive environment, especially in younger years. I think that as long as the kids have someone that loves them, keeps them safe, encourages them to reach high, and teaches them morals for living, one parent can easily do this. Although, many thank having both parents is better for the child, but sometimes the child doesn't have a choice, he may have to be with just one parent and being with just that one parent, could be the best thing ever for that child. Sometimes, even though there are two parents, it could make for a long haul for the kid. Because one may lack the ability to teach respect, morals, and be in control.
2007-03-23 02:06:23 · answer #4 · answered by soggybottomscout_25 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.... they need love, support, guidance, discipline, encouragement.... and many, many other things. But they do not need two parents; if one can give these things, or if they have other family in their lives... two parents is not always an option.... there are many times where a parent passes on... moves far away... etc. life is not so cut and dry... things happen and we need to be respectful of that. As long as a child feels safe, secure and comfortable with who they are.. they will grow up just fine!
2007-03-23 01:59:08 · answer #5 · answered by JustJen 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it gives balance in life. How else can a child know the wonders of male and female interaction if not by living, observing and experiencing the union. Each, male and female, contribute a different perspective on love and relationship, discipline, the teaching of character, morales and values.
Every child should have the benefit of knowing and interacting with both parents. In life that is the purpose of the monogamous union of male and female---to be caretakes of the earth and to be fruitful and multiply.
2007-03-23 02:13:27 · answer #6 · answered by S C 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It is not necessary, but it is best if they do have both a mother figure and father figure. I am divorced however my children are very well adapted and see a lot of their father although I have primary custody. Some children have no choice but to grow up with only one parent because of death or desertion and some do very well while others do not. I think it all depends on the support system they have left behind.
2007-03-23 01:58:36 · answer #7 · answered by icunurse85 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would say that it would be ideal if both parents are good decent people. But in my case my kids father is really messed up, and I have been raising them all by myself anyway. So while it is the best condition for a child to have two good parents.... it is not necessary and if one parent is screwed up possibly more harmful than good.
2007-03-23 02:04:41 · answer #8 · answered by Destiny 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think having to parents is good as long as they get along but it is not always necessary. I know a lot of single parents who do go jobs raising their children without other parent. I guess it depends on the situation of each family.
2007-03-23 02:02:55 · answer #9 · answered by lovablegal77 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not necessarily "need" 2 parents, But I believe it's better for them to hv both around as long as the parents r loving n supportive.
2007-03-23 02:01:27 · answer #10 · answered by •♦๑•TxRose•♦๑• 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
this gives them a balance in there life. two parents offset each other. Sometimes my daughters will say things to me that they won't ask or say to my wife and vise versa
occasionally one parent has to act on the child's behalf to address the other parent on a situation that can only be settled between equals
2007-03-23 02:37:41 · answer #11 · answered by Dave 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋