felt compelled to ask this question. lol
2007-03-22 17:44:41 · 29 answers · asked by The Claymaker- Go Pack! 6 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
they both suck!!! but at one time brooks was considered pretty good, until he stopped running around and tried to be something he is not! a pocket passer! when the saints went to the playoffs in 2000 brooks took over for blake and did an outstanding job! thing was he scrambled alot and made plays. soon he was scared of getting hit, he even admitted he wasn't going to run as much because he didn't want to get hit! so their you go!
2007-03-23 07:07:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Rex Grossman
2007-03-23 11:00:05 · answer #2 · answered by Caleb's Mom 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well if you HONESTLY knew football, you would know that Grossman is better. Perhaps on his best day Brooks is better then Grossman is on his worst day. In a general question though Grossman is far better then Brooks. Heck I doubt Brooks has ever had a QB rating over 100. Grossman started all season last year, his first full year as a starter if I am not mistaken.
Brooks was CUT by the Raiders. He was never BENCHED by them as I remember, he went down to injury and became the starter when he was healthy again. As to it being a "negative vibe" in Oakland, HE SUCKED with the Saints as well. He has always been a terriable QB and I don't know how he got in the NFL.
2007-03-23 08:10:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Aaron Brooks is horrible, but I'm a Saints fan, and if your little brains will go back, mr. b m, Brooks led us to our first playoff victory in history. Rex Grossman didn't even win in the playoffs until this year, and he had a lot of help. The Bears could've gona to the playoffs with Charlie Batch.
2007-03-23 10:04:13 · answer #4 · answered by Herb C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Raiders fans will say Aaron Brooks and Da Bears fans will say Rex Grossman. But I am a Buccaneers fan and I say Rex is way better.
2007-03-23 07:42:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you guys joking? Rex is WAAAAAY better than Brooks. No comparison. Do any of you remember Rex in the beginning of the season, or do your little minds not go that far back? Rex has a lot more potential than Brooks too. Brooks got benched in favor of Andrew Walther. Would you rather have Andrew Walter than Rex too?
2007-03-23 04:03:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmmm...who got to a Superbowl, came through for their team in the playoffs, and starts for their respective team? Rex Grossman. He is the best QB on the Chicago Bears.
2007-03-23 01:22:06 · answer #7 · answered by SHARK 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rex Grossman since he has a team and is the starter despite how poorly or well he plays he will still have an opportunity.
2007-03-23 01:06:35 · answer #8 · answered by Frank R 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
aaron brooks he is with a bad team and Rex Grossman was with a good team and he sucked there.
2007-03-23 08:30:50 · answer #9 · answered by meanmachine4242 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
pretty hilarious question. who is better, a first year starting quarterback, or some awful guy that got benched by the worst offense in football?
who is better, rex grossman or joseph stalin? felt compelled to ask this question, LOL!
2007-03-23 04:30:24 · answer #10 · answered by vertumnus2 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Aaron Brooks to me has more potential. Rex Grossman looks good, but won't become any better.
2007-03-23 01:37:22 · answer #11 · answered by ftballtwenty1 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋