Evolution: real or a theory?

Question

In your opinion, is evolution real, or just a cooked up theory?

Answer 1

This is so cool! I just did a paper on this. Here ya go!


Creationism/evolution



Creationism Vs. Evolution


Evolutionists believe that creationism is not a science because it is not backed by good research. The article by Frank R. Zindler states that we are presented with more than one example of mythological tales about creation yet we are asked to believe in only one god/creator. Who should this god be? The answer points to the god of western civilization.
Creation Theory misuses the term “theory” because in science a true theory must pass tests using scientific principles and laws. Because a concept of a god is not testable creationism cannot be seen as a theory.
On the flipside, evolution is testable. Fossil records and geographical distribution of plants and animals do not fit into the “theory” of creationism because of the many things that predate man. In John W. Klotz’s article “Creationist View Points;” Klotz admits that this does cause a problem for creationism. He counts it by saying that there are also things evolutionists cannot explain either. He feels that there are flaws in evolution evidenced by mutations. He feels that mutations are usually harmful in species and often lead to their demise. Evolutionists combat that by saying that it is usually only the fast mutations that are usually harmful. That evolution is meant to be a slow process and survival of the fittest.
Klotz feels that scientists cannot see creationism because they lack “the faithful eye.” Faith is believing in the unseen. Creationists believe that behind the process of changes in the world is the hand of God. In Klotz’s article he clings to the work of Isaac Newton and LaPlace who believed that God created the universe and knew the impending processes and put them into place. Klotz worries scientists will further reason that God’s existence would then no longer be needed. Thus furthering evolutionist’s stance. “If there is no purpose in the universe then there is no reason for a god.”
Klotz feels that creationism points out the complexities of nature as an evidence of the wisdom of God and his plan. God has a purpose in everything that happens even though creationists have no way of demonstrating proof.
I feel the overall theory of evolution makes more sense. To me Zindler’s article was more convincing because evolution does not base itself on a personal belief system fueled by emotion. Religion has too many areas that are not answerable. I feel religion is an ancient human attempt to define themselves and to provide basic principles of self-governing.

Works Cited

http://www.atheists.org/evolution/creationscience.html
http://www.creationism.org/symposium/symplnoz.htm

Answer 2

Wow. You really do need to understand that in science "theory" doesn't mean "blind guess." It is not the opposite of "real."

In science, a theory is an explanation of something that is backed up by evidence.

Other examples of theories are the theory of gravity, the atomic theory of matter, the germ theory of disease, and the theory that the earth moves around the sun. The theory of evolution is among those theories.

Scientists don't just "cook up" theories. They base them on *evidence*. Scientists don't believe theories without evidence. And over 98% of the world's scientists (most of whom are pretty smart people) accept the theory of evolution ... and there is no other reason for all those scientists to accept it than the fact that there is powerful evidence. They are not stupid!

So evolution is both a powerfully strong theory, and absolutely *real*.

Answer 3

As many have answered, a "theory" is NOT a guess...it is the HIGHEST status that science can place on an idea...despite what you learned in HS there are no Laws...so gravity is a theory not a law. Would you question the reality of gravity?

If you are posing this question for religious view points, then be aware that there are many in organized religions that acknowledge the validity of evolution (most notably the late Pope and as the official rep..the Catholic Church) Those who believe in a god created universe, designed to evolve, fall under a title of theistic evolutionist.

If you are interested in observing evolution in your lifetime then listen to the news...every year there are "new" strains of the flu that vaccinations must be created for. Why do you think that is?...because the virus EVOLVES!

Answer 4

It's a theory, but not a theory like the creationists say, as in "just a guess" it's a scientific theory backed up by a lot of evidence, observations, debate and general consensus amongst the scientific community and research. It's a real theory, not a cooked up one, and I'm surprised that so many people in the western world are still debating this.

Answer 5

Evolution was a theory when it was first postulated. Since that time, an extremely large body of evidence, chemical, biological, paleontological, and other forms, has been found to support it. There has never been one shred of credible evidence, not one iota, presented to refute it. Given this vast amount of proof, it is safe to say that evolution is as much a fact as things like gravity and electricity. It is as true as we can know anything to be true. Those who deny it are simply choosing archaic religious dogma over fact, and should be dismissed out of hand. The truth is that evolution is God's most glorious and elegant creation.

Answer 6

However, if "science" is going to talk about the "nature of reality" using
the "silly ideas" expressed in QM theory, then "religion and philosophy"
certainly has an equal justification for talking about the "nature of reality"
using "silly ideas" like souls, spirits, and life after death.
====================
The most simple design, which was created
by the God / Nature , is atom of hydrogen.
The most complex design, which was created
by the God / Nature , is the Man.
The Man is alive essence.
Animals, bird, fish are alive essences.
And an atom?
And atom is also alive design.
The atom of hydrogen lives 12 minutes.
And someone a long time ago has already said, that if
to give suffices time to atom of hydrogen, he will turn into Man.
Therefore, the one, who creates a general picture of Life,
must consider development of evolution of Life from atom up to the Man.
* * *
Once upon a time, in the beginning, there was one "single point " accidentally.
Then it has caught a cold accidentally and has blown up: Big Bang " has taken place.
It was the reason of accidental creation of some hundreds
(thousands) kinds of elementary particles and their girlfriends - antiparticles.
Then stars were formed accidentally.
Then the Planet the Earth was formed accidentally.
Then atom of hydrogen was accidentally formed.
Then complex atom was accidentally formed.
Then was accidentally formed vegetative and fauna.
Then the man was created accidentally.
And this man can accidentally think logically.
But of course, unfortunately, not always.
================
http://www.socratus.com
====================

Answer 7

evolution is a theory, because well, people cant exactly see it happening because they dont live long enough to. however, a lot of evidence (eg. fossils and such) have been provided to back it up. furthermore, all the other experiments and threories and such that scientists have come up with supports the theory of evolution. the theory also sheds a lot of light into biology in a whole.

Answer 8

I still consider evolution to be a theory but as my professor explained it, it is widely accepted because most biologists regard it as more than a theory - they consider it to be common knowledge, but for me it's a theory that works only because strong enough evidence has not been shown to disprove it.

Answer 9

its a theory everything in science is just a theory. plus im a strong creationist...or if you would like to call it intelligent design whatever. but evolution is a theory...seriously when did a nonliving object suddenly become living? not possible! that theory was proved in the 1500's when they figured out mice dont come from grain!

Answer 10

Evolution is a scientific phenomenon proven in the late 19th century. Charles Darwin's "Origin of Species" was first published in 1859. I suggest you read it.