Option 1 is true love. Love is patient, Kind, and selfless. If it requires reciprocation, It was never love to begin with.
2007-03-23 12:56:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Answerer 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Option 1`
2007-03-22 16:40:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by pandora_293 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The scope of your question is too ill defined.
In option 1, for example, can I still feel emotional love and still receive emotional love? Maybe not from that one person but from some person at all? If it's just that I can't hug, kiss, or have sex, then I'd choose this one. Love is so very much more than the physical acts.
In option 2 I'm pretty sure I'd be suffering from antisocial personality disorder and wouldn't care much either way.
So option 3 is contingent on whether I can't love, emotionally, but still, somehow, care that I can't enough to choose death.
2007-03-22 22:07:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by ophelliaz 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'm quite torn I'd have to go with option 2 because you cant miss what you never had. I am siding with the ignorance is bliss concept on this one. With option 1 you would be miserable all of the time and option 3 is giving up.
2007-03-22 16:43:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by lil e 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
As odd as it may sound, I've experienced all three options during my lifetime. (One at a time). Fortunately all 3 were short term and I've been given the opportunity to make wiser choices, correct past mistakes and learn many things about life, all that it entails as well as about myself!!!
For me, the lack of loves presence IN life (options 1 or 2), life is simply not worth living and I'd prefer death.
2007-03-22 19:05:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Izen G 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
option 2
2007-03-22 16:34:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by dirka 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Option 1. We can love and not receive love back. The point is, we are feeling. I wouldn't want to live is a world without being able to feel love. God is Love.
2007-03-22 16:39:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by sheba 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Option 1. What is life without love? "It is better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all".
2007-03-22 22:36:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Traveller 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I suppose option 2, because if you were actually unable to feel love, then you wouldn't know what you were missing anyway.
2007-03-22 16:41:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by fra_bob 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Death. Unrequited love is the worst torture there is. Life with nothing to love is pointless. This assumes, of course, that the inability to love also applies to platonic love and a passion for abstract concepts.
2007-03-22 16:36:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by answerator 5
·
0⤊
0⤋