T.O. is a better football player when he wants to be. The only problem is that both of these players are self serving. I'd have to say TO is better because he blocks very well downfield and I've never seen Moss block anyone. The only thing about TO that I hate is his need to be the center of attraction, it isn't enough to score a few TD's every few weeks. Moss could be better but he doesn't work as hard as the other PROFESSIONAL players. If he had a better work ethic Moss might have challenged Jerry Rice for the best reciever ever.
2007-03-22 18:05:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by steelerspride24 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The rumor from Dallas is T.O. is an idiot and I mean that in the dictionary definition kind of way, so I'm going with Randy Moss. When a pro player like T.O. can't even memorize his teams own system such as the playbook, he is just too risky as a starter.
2007-03-23 05:19:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by gregory_dittman 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Randy moss beater than T.o football catch ball touChdown.
2007-03-23 04:46:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by vertumnus2 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Moss has the better attitude hands down. TO is the better team player without question. Moss does not disrupt his team with antics, instead he may say/do something that is un-learned. TO is ignorant, but he may have a point. Players want to physically hurt TO and genuinely do not like him, unless he is on their team and even then that is a litmus test for all involved. Moss is better respected among his peers because he has not stood on the STAR at Dallas, then played for the team, he hasn't been fined for spitting in a defenders face during a game, and he has not hurled insults at his quarterback all season long, even though he can't get the ball to Moss. Moss is the better man who has a greater likelihood to someday be given a grudging respect throughout the league. TO will eventually be villified, which is a shame because he is a real hero in uniform, unfortunately only as a player, not as a man. His stats say so, even over his injuries.
2007-03-23 01:34:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by mark_hensley@sbcglobal.net 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
T.O. will do anything he can to win on the field. Off the field he is a leech. Still, hes better than Randy Moss.
2007-03-23 16:22:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by kyle h 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both are very, very talented but obviously both are flawed. Terrell Owens was more productive than Randy Moss this past year, but he's a trouble-maker (whether misunderstood by the media or not). Moss has all-world talent, but obviously he takes too many plays off and doesn't exactly have anyone on the Raiders who can get him the ball often enough for him to make an impact.
2007-03-22 23:54:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Alyssa 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Randy Moss has a lot more natural talent than Owens, but since Owens works a lot harder I'd give him the edge right now. If Moss gave 100% for an entire season, and if he had a QB worth a $hit, he'd be the best Wr in all of football.
2007-03-22 23:51:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Randy Moss is better at catching the ball, but T.O. is better at holding on to the ball, he is just stronger than Randy.
2007-03-22 23:35:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by minnesotabluerags 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Randy moss is much better i don't like T.O
2007-03-22 23:38:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
TO is extremely good, but Randy Moss is probably the best wide reciever in football, now. Maybe, in the top 5 of all time.
2007-03-23 01:42:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by ftballtwenty1 4
·
0⤊
0⤋