2007-03-22 16:02:45 · 6 answers · asked by K 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Yes,and Mao-tse Tung.They had more time and were less discriminating about who they killed,so they racked up higher numbers.Yes,let's debate who was more ethical in their genocides,get real,a bully is a bully.The facts are there for anybody to discover.There is no moral high ground in genocide.
2007-03-22 16:06:48 · answer #1 · answered by kevin k 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are still trying to figure out just how many people Stalin killed.
2007-03-22 23:15:07 · answer #2 · answered by C B 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One death is a tragedy; a million is a statistic- Joseph Stalin
What do you think?
2007-03-22 23:18:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes but he was on our side and Hitler probably would have triumphed if not and how many died in Nagasaki and Hiroshima to save many others.
2007-03-22 23:15:50 · answer #4 · answered by molly 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes.
2007-03-22 23:29:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Stone cold fact my friend. But communism is good, fascism is bad, so your history books and the lefties won't tell you that.
2007-03-22 23:09:21 · answer #6 · answered by Tucson Hooligan 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋