Eat a cooked rat or catch & cook it yourself?
2007-03-22 15:33:34 · 14 answers · asked by ? 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I would go hungry until I could rustle myself up something else besides rat.
2007-03-22 15:38:22 · answer #1 · answered by Rowan 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Catch it and cook it, you didn't say I'd still have to eat it. Anyone hungry?
( I can hardly type I'm laughing so hard...my cat just rolled over and fell off the desk...lmao!)
2007-03-22 15:42:13 · answer #2 · answered by Koozie 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It depends on if they had dropped the bomb and the world was starving. Then I'd do either. Rat would be a delicacy. If there's no nuclear war, then neither. In a million years.
2007-03-22 15:37:32 · answer #3 · answered by Nightlight 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
well, i would rather catch and cook it because it doesn't say anything about EATING it when i'm done cooking it
2007-03-22 15:38:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
catch and cook
2007-03-22 15:39:12 · answer #5 · answered by JB 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
catch it, cook it and mix it in with a bucket of Popeye's chicken and give it to my neighbors across the street.
2007-03-22 15:37:12 · answer #6 · answered by duvaldiva.com 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
eat it.
hands down.
I dont want to be bitten and contract some deadly disease that eventually kills me. If it's cooked, then there's less of a chance of me dying because of whatever disease it's got.
2007-03-22 15:37:44 · answer #7 · answered by evvykat 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
none of the above
I'm on rat free diet
2007-03-22 15:36:45 · answer #8 · answered by Angel Girl 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Neither. I would rather starve.
2007-03-22 15:40:35 · answer #9 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
cook it myself? na neither!!!!
2007-03-22 15:42:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋