Even one would be too many.
2007-03-23 00:28:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
There are plenty of local authority councillors but no BNP members to date. As you can see from some of the rest of the answers there are also plenty of misinformed and misguided people who see the BNP as racialist. Racialism is a bad thing where ever it starts up. What these misinformed people must do is understand the difference between Racialism and concern. There will be BNP members of Parliament in the next elections as there will be UKIP members because the level of concern about the present governments ethnic cleansing programme can clearly be seen with the eye and obviously the 'Right to Exist' becomes paramount to the indigenous Britain. I would not be surprised to see between 50 or 60 BNP and UKIP members in the next house. This will bring much needed diversity into British politics and the process for an engine to change. All three mainstream parties no longer represent the Indigenous Britain and that is a real problem. If the BNP and UKIP are not elected Britain will be in a serious state of decline with no way out. Its all down to the ballot boxes I hope every Britain does his or her duty and starts the fight to recovery.
ATB Red
2007-03-23 14:14:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Redmonk 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
None, but I think a large vote for the BNP might shake the main parties out of their appalling smugness.
2007-03-25 18:26:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Beau Brummell 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hopfully more than the labour government to get the limp wristed politically correct do-gooders and kick them out of office. The BNP get my vote, i voted for them in the last general election.
2007-03-26 14:18:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by phil 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
-one. those who say that they are not racist are indeed Miss informed. After reading the BNP manifesto - which is simply daft, and would be the downfall of the UK, well England really - so who cares lol (nah joke) the BNP are racist. and there in simply no chance of them winning ONE seat in the UK Parliament. Not just because of their daft, anti black, anti Asian outlook, but also because of the way the votes are counted. FPTP (First Past The Post) almost ensures that smaller parties are not elected into Parliament. However, there is growing concern of the foot hold that the BNP are getting down way south, so they may get ONE - BUT this is VERY, VERY doubt-full. Thankfully :)
2007-03-24 12:11:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Soylent 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
There are currently no MP's from the BNP who have been elected into Parliament.
2007-03-23 17:02:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
FACISIM IS FORCING OPINION AND WILL ON TE POPULUS IE TAKING AWAY FREEDOM OF SPEECH (MULTICULTURALISM) IS FACISIM COMMUNISUM IS MULTICULTURALISM.
THIS IS FROM THE CHILD SUPPORT AGENCY WEB SITE
If the non-resident parent has a job the first thing we try is to take the money direct from their wages. For new cases we aim to do this within four months from when we first told them what they should pay.
An employer is required by law to take maintenance from parents’ wages if we tell them to. Currently 160,000 parents pay child maintenance this way.
If this does not work we will start by applying to the courts for a liability order for the missed child maintenance. This allows us to take legal action to get the money owed. Between October 2005 and October 2006 12,900 liability orders were granted. This is up from 10,500 between March 2005 and March 2006.
The legal action we can then take will depend on each case and we can use more than one at a time.
In summer 2006 we started working with private debt-collection agencies to collect money from parents who had not paid for a number of months, or years. Their bailiffs act on our behalf to seize the parent’s belongings and sell them to get the money owed. So far 23,000 parents have had their cases pursued by private debt collectors.
We can take a range of action through the courts. 13,000 parents were presented with a summons and taken to court between October 2005 and October 2006. This might include getting a third-party debt order to freeze money belonging to or owed to the parent. This stops them from using their bank account or getting money from an unpaid invoice if they are self-employed and we can then ask for the child maintenance to be paid.
If we can prove to a magistrate that the parent has refused to pay the child maintenance they owe, we can apply to have their driving licence taken away or for them to be sent to prison. Between October 2005 and October 2006 400 parents received immediate or suspended prison terms. Even if the parent is disqualified from driving or sent to prison, they will still have to pay all the money they owe.
THIS IS FACISM....MOST OF THE FATHERS WHO DONT PAY, CANT AFFORD TO DO SO, BECAUSE ON THIER 1000 POUNDS A MONTH WAGE THE CSA WANTS 250, THEY HAVE MORTGAES TO PAY ETC AND AS TYOU ARE AWARE THEY ARE USUALLY IN THE REGION OF 600 PER MONTH FOR A YOUNG ADULT, THEY THEN HAVE TO FIND BILS AND FOOD MONEY AND AS SUCH CAN NOT AFFORD TO LIVE...DO THE MATHS.
I PRSONALLY PAY 200 QUID HALF WHAT THEY WANT, I HAVE NO SURPLUS FUNDS LEFT AFTER THAT, I HAVE NO LIFE.
WHY CANT THE CSA JUST TAKE INCOME AND EXPENDITURE INTO ACCOUNT BEFORE ASSEMENT, THEY DONT AND THIS IS A SMALL PART OF TE TOTALITARIAN COMMUNIST MULTICULTRAL HELL BEING FORCED ON THE GREAT BRITISH INDIGINOUS PEOPLE.
2007-03-24 13:20:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by muttentrumpet 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
None!
Thank fully!
and long may it contiue to be so.
2007-03-23 09:22:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by noeusuperstate 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
We could do with some to displace the left-wing bed wetters that are ruining/running this country.
2007-03-23 04:23:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
5⤋
None, and for good reason - they're fascists, and have no place in a representative democracy.
2007-03-22 21:48:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by Captain Flaps 3
·
5⤊
3⤋