2007-03-22 14:08:41 · 23 answers · asked by jack_diam_01 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
Maybe in about 50 years, once the monarchy is no more and we're living in a culture not unlike "Starship Troopers". Then they'll discuss it openly in their social studies about how a national figurehead was assassinated to maintain a shaky status quo./
2007-03-22 14:17:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Oh for goodness sakes ... how many more times ..... she didn't fasten the seat belt, the only survivor who did buckle up survived the impact. What part of that do you all not understand?
She was not important enough to the royals anymore for them to have orchestrated this so called 'murder' and depending on who you believe at any given time, she wasn't contemplating a future with Dodi anyway, she was more interested in Hasnet Khan the heart specialist and was using Dodi to make him jealous.
Move on, other things are happening in the world you live in
2007-03-24 11:04:50 · answer #2 · answered by Eden* 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I WISH THE TRUTH WOULD COME OUT I HAVE BELIEFS THE SAME AS A LOT OF PEOPLE,ONE MORE BIT WHY DID,NT THE QUEEN SAY ANYTHING WHEN PAUL BURRELL WENT TO COURT,UNTIL THE LAST MINUTE,WHEN HE WENT TO SEE THE QUEEN AND SAID HE WOULD SAY CERTAIN THINGS ABOUT THE DEATH OF DIANA AND THE ROYAL S ,SHE SOON HAD THE CASE ENDED JUST THINK ABOUT IT,STRANGE
2007-03-23 21:32:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Personally I believe that there is no cover up.
I think that Henri Paul was p!ssed and he crashed the car.
They should let he rest in peace as the 2 lads have requested.
Fayed is undoutably still mourning the death of his son and cant come to terms that this was a tragic accident.
That is my view anyway.
2007-03-22 21:32:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
The truth is already out. People just refuse to believe that the blame for her ACCIDENT, (yes, i said accident), lies firmly at her own feet. She chose to get into the car, being driven by a man clearly unser the influence of something to be driven at speed through a city he was not used to. She died because she was silly enough to get into the car. Tragic but true.
2007-03-23 03:10:01 · answer #5 · answered by monkeyface 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Do people who buy into one ridiculous conspiracy theory usually buy into many? Is Elvis alive and playing footsy with Jackie Kennedy? Did they land on the moon or was it done in a studio. Nostradamus and ALL the ends of the world theories, JFK assassination theories, Alien creatures with multiple sexual organs?
What kind of a mind buys into all this crap? Let's not forget Al Gore and the global warming, criticized by most scientists, but nevertheless promoted by the inventor of cyber space or whatever he claimed. (By the way, his carbon credits are paid to a company he has ownership in--this info released by FOX news yesterday). If you say FOX news is slanted, you are right, but I bet you'll never see a libel suit on this because my guess is it's true.
2007-03-22 22:08:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
About 10 years ago.
2007-03-22 21:12:16 · answer #7 · answered by J9 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Never. Diana was engaged to an Egyptain prince that's why her family killed her. Didn't want her to bring shame on the family.
2007-03-22 21:12:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Pissed bloke gets behind the wheel.
Aristocratic slapper and boyfriend get in the back.
None wear seatbelts.
Pissed bloke drives into wall at 100mph.
All three die.
Where exactly is the mystery?
2007-03-22 21:54:08 · answer #9 · answered by Captain Flaps 3 · 7⤊ 0⤋
the real truth will never come out, why because people prefer to believe a lie
2007-03-22 21:18:34 · answer #10 · answered by Ash4ElishaCuthbert 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋