2007-03-22 13:09:43 · 13 answers · asked by lil-yoel24 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Personally, I don't!
2007-03-22 13:13:11 · answer #1 · answered by Celeste P 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
NO,.......More and more, the parallels between Vietnam and Iraq are being drawn. Vietnam had the Gulf of Tonkin incident fabrication. Iraq had the fabrication about weapons of mass destruction. Vietnam had Agent Orange. Iraq has depleted uranium. During Vietnam, the White House and military vastly overstated the "progress" being made. Only the ideologically blind accept the lie that progress is being made in Iraq. The military has started issuing daily body counts in Iraq just as they did in Vietnam, overstating their "successes" through inflated numbers. Somehow, the citizenry is to believe that progress is being made with every "insurgent" death count announcement. Look, we killed 50 today! We're moving forward! Vietnam had the Vietnamization of its conflict. Iraq has the Iraqization of its conflict. Ronald Bruce St. John, in his piece posted on The Progress Report, "Sorry, Mr. President, but Iraq looks a lot like Vietnam", states:
I served a tour of duty in Vietnam in 1970-71 and returned in the late 1980s for the first of several prolonged visits. Based on my experience, Iraq today looks more and more like the Vietnam I knew firsthand as an army intelligence officer more than three decades ago.
And, both Vietnam and Iraq were wars of choice. Neither country posed any direct threat to the United states.
Elizabeth de la Vega, in "The White House Criminal Conspiracy" (TomDispath.com Oct, 30) provides the facts whereby,
The evidence shows, then, that from early 2002 to at least March 2003, the President and his aides conspired to defraud the United States by intentionally misrepresenting intelligence about Iraq to persuade Congress to authorize force, thereby interfering with Congress's lawful functions of overseeing foreign affairs and making appropriations, all of which violates Title 18, United States Code, Section 371.
2007-03-22 13:13:22 · answer #2 · answered by dstr 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes iw ould have to say yes. being the president is a hard job no matter what ppl are going to hate you and you will need to deal with it. i think that the war is good and i have no idea why ppl say that the soliders are crazy and he is the only one that they talk two they need to stand up and not just blame every thing on the president and grow balls i hate ppl that try to do that.
2007-03-22 13:16:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think he has made too many mistakes during his presidency to be considered a good president. Also with all the scandal with his cabinet over the years.....not good!!!!!
2007-03-22 13:15:20 · answer #4 · answered by gatorgrad99_99 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
for Saudi Arabia
2007-03-22 13:13:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good for the Demecrats. He has single handedly sunk the Republican party
2007-03-22 13:14:21 · answer #6 · answered by jesta.drifter 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yes, he's a good prezz
2007-03-22 13:13:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋
helll no in fact he's the worst prez this country has ever had
2007-03-22 13:13:53 · answer #8 · answered by wayneo 1 · 4⤊ 0⤋
No, no, a thousand times no.
2007-03-22 13:32:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nobody's perfect,but he makes me safe in USA !
2007-03-22 13:21:26 · answer #10 · answered by greβ 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋