To an extent, which is why I think Gonzales is doomed. He is responsible for the FBI, and the heat will get worse, like it or not.
2007-03-22 12:48:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
The services have done this countless times in the past, and it is merely spotlighted in todays civic attention. As to the why, well, partly due to being told to by thier superior officers and leaders. The need was there, and they used the resources to follow on the need. Now we have folks whining about "violations" .... gee, I would rather have the violation of someone listening to my calls than the violation of someone hijacking a plane and crashing it, with ME, into a building. For all those whiners... what are you so worried about? Dealing drugs or something? Grow up. There are far too many and worse things to worry about than some organisation trying to monitor you to PROTECT you.
.... ok, rant done...lol
2007-03-22 13:00:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Unforgiven Shadow 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
And who, of the persons who certainly have the authority to realize this, are "annoying that Cheney be tried for conflict crimes"? are you able to call one member of the ICJ that has suggested as for an indictment of the former vice-president? Do you even understand what the ICJ is? Heck, i think of OJ did homicide his ex-spouse and her boyfriend, yet that doesn't advise that there might desire to be yet another trial merely because of fact of what i think of. a similar is going for you, > each and each individual who does certainly analyze permit you recognize that web pages are actually not real documentation. I asked you to call one (merely one) member of the ICJ it is even thinking issuing an indictment to Dick Cheney and you post an internet site that may not from the ICJ. wager what, the three morons from "loose replace" have an internet site. Is that data? of path not. there is extra data that Bigfoot exists. How approximately you have some refresher on the thank you to do certainly analyze and inspect the ICJ. Then come lower back with what you have. >BTW. I did hassle to accomplish slightly analyze for in this count. The ICJ deals with international agreements, not conflict crimes. even although, the international criminal courtroom does prosecute conflict crimes and crimes against humanity; they have issued warrants to the president of Sudan at present. The ICC has won hundreds of courtroom cases regarding the 2003 invasion of Iraq, yet has not got here upon any foundation for issuing any warrants, much less indictments.
2016-11-27 23:35:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by jech 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
how about when the clintons violated the 200 fbi files that they were never supossed to have? you liberal assholes are beyond blind stupidity! President Bush never violated one law or your buddies would have impeached him.Keep twisting in the wind!Love your frustration!
2007-03-22 13:14:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by dumbuster 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Can you prove that FBI misconduct has increased under Bush? Do you have any evidence at all? Of course not!
2007-03-22 12:48:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
What's your source? And don't say the patriot act cause it
ain't so.
As a matter of curiosity, When, where and who?
2007-03-22 12:54:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by producer_vortex 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because the Patriot Act gave away many of our essential rights. Luckily, Congress is working to fix that.
2007-03-22 12:48:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Vaughn 6
·
3⤊
3⤋
Don't forget the CIA. Bush likes to violate things. He's just like a kid in a candy shop....DON'T PRESS THE RED BUTTON BUSH! I SAID DON.....
2007-03-22 12:47:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jedi 4
·
3⤊
4⤋
they haven't. lay off of CNN and the new york times. you've been brainwashed.
2007-03-22 12:53:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by patriot07 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because Bush thinks he can ignore the law.
And he appointed Gonzales as AG to ensure that he could.
2007-03-22 12:48:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
5⤊
4⤋