English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-22 12:07:00 · 12 answers · asked by Dave S 1 in Arts & Humanities History

12 answers

Making armour was rare, in todays terms only those who could afford a super sports car would have had a suit of armour and so the skills needed would have been way beyond the average blacksmith.

Most people in battle were peasants, If they could afford weapons they would have got them from a blacksmith

I would say armourer due to it being a specialist skill

2007-03-22 12:21:06 · answer #1 · answered by Northern Spriggan 6 · 0 1

Depends on the type of Armour and when, where.

A normal Blacksmith could knock up a suit of armour for someone, but it would be pretty poor quality unless you had a good one around.

Medieval was a large period and there was anything from straight Chainmail up to complicated Plate by the end of the 17th Century.

2007-03-22 12:18:43 · answer #2 · answered by Kevan M 6 · 0 1

Same as now the name hasnt changed - its an armourer.

2007-03-22 23:56:08 · answer #3 · answered by frankturk50 6 · 0 0

An armourer, what else?

Old French "armurier", later "armeurier", same meaning.

2007-03-22 12:16:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Blacksmith

2007-03-22 12:14:26 · answer #5 · answered by Carl-N-Vicky S 4 · 0 1

I would have thought it was an Armourer.

2007-03-23 01:11:56 · answer #6 · answered by Beau Brummell 6 · 0 0

Still a blacksmith I believe

2007-03-22 12:10:57 · answer #7 · answered by spiegy2000 6 · 0 1

a Blacksmith

2007-03-22 12:14:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

An armorour

2007-03-22 12:16:04 · answer #9 · answered by Albinoballs 5 · 1 0

Mine was called Allan if thats any help.

2007-03-22 15:52:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers