English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

None!

2007-03-22 12:02:04 · answer #1 · answered by producer_vortex 6 · 0 0

I think that state governments should set state curriculums and that parents need to have their children meet these curriculums but the parents may choose to do over and above these minimums.

I have seen several homeschooling parents in our school that use homeschooling to keep their children at home to keep mother company. This is not to say all homeschooling parents do this. Many do a very fine job. But I know two in particular that do provide learning for their children at all.

2007-03-22 11:48:53 · answer #2 · answered by redunicorn 7 · 0 1

Very little. The government can currently determine the curriculum. It can also dictate which public school children are to attend if they do attend public school. They cannot determine and should not determine anything else. After all, what does the government do efficiently besides collect taxes?

2007-03-22 13:04:50 · answer #3 · answered by madrom 4 · 0 0

When a student says F888 Y%% to a teacher, and the teacher is afraid to do anything, out of fear of reprisal, then the state needs to step in.If a student feels he can say F*% Y097 to a teacher and getaway with it, he'll never learn respect for authority. This will result in that person being dogmeat on the job market, unable to get a decent job and keep it, and we;ll have another unproductive citizen on our hands.

2007-03-22 13:08:13 · answer #4 · answered by Barry auh2o 7 · 0 1

limited. the main substantial concern in united states of america is that government became a provider of training. because of the fact the government is offering the training on the fee of all tax payers, it (purely like broadcast television) has to attraction to the backside elementary denominator. it is likewise why we spend a ludicrous volume of time debating such issues as whether or not smart layout and/or Evolution might desire to learn at school. the wide-unfold public sq. (encompassing all government land and amenities that are in reality owned via and offered to all human beings) can exist in 2 and in basic terms 2 varieties. the 1st is the only we use on the instant it fairly is the source of many problems - cultural sanitization. attempting to get rid of any indication that each physique 3 hundred million human beings do not proportion precisely the comparable opinion on each little thing via removing something all people dislikes with the aid of legislations and regulation suits. the 2nd is to allow each physique show and embody their adjustments. this might require tolerance - i.e. i will pray to Jesus and you will possibly be able to wish to Allah and we'd desire to continuously the two be happy that we live someplace the place we are allowed to persist with our on hearts. that's not likely to ever fairly take place. there is an out although and that is observed as privatization. i'm an atheist and don't prefer smart layout being compelled down my young toddlers throats. I haven't any concern with parents that prefer that interior the class room putting their young toddlers in a non secular college although. The loose industry grants those strategies for us, government via that is totally nature won't be able to. i think government might desire to be seen as a regulatory company in basic terms and not in any respect ever a right away provider because of the fact of aforementioned problems. for that reason the government might desire to verify to work out that the youngsters are easily receiving an acceptable eduacation. permit the parents % the nuances of it although and make the colleges compete for college scholars. My young toddlers would be those making use of their palms to make society a miles better place. Their young toddlers would be those clasping their palms jointly wishing for issues to magically get extra effective. and then we can all be happy won't we?

2016-10-19 09:10:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

it seems to me minority parents don't even make decisions having to do with their child's education. they remain illiterate and ignorant, hundreds of them end up in homeless shelters, and then the government has to take care of them. but what can the government do to fix that, even if they had the authority? they can't force the parents to care for their children. it's really a lose/lose situation.

2007-03-22 11:49:34 · answer #6 · answered by Mon Ray 4 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers