By the people ....for the people!!
2007-03-22 11:21:50 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
In a way it would be OK as it would cut down on the actual amount of legislation passed. But realistically it would be expensive and impossible to implement on a national scale. Just think, how fast could we mobilize a national election to approve emergency funding for storm damage relief the next time a Katrina like storm hits?
2007-03-23 11:35:07 · answer #1 · answered by meathookcook 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. Wouldn't work. That's a Direct Democracy, and as is, while that would certainly eliminate much of the irritating beurocracy, it just isn't feasible for a country of 300,000. Imagine everyone in the nation being a member of Congress every single day
2007-03-22 11:29:49 · answer #2 · answered by fiddlesoup 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You must live in a city...a big city...because it would be to your benefit that city thinking would motivate all the laws. You could sit in your apartment and ban...like...you know...guns and stuff.
2007-03-22 13:09:05 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. That would be too time consuming.
2007-03-22 11:51:40 · answer #4 · answered by a bush family member 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋