We all know that many democratic politicians would love to rip into the fact that Bush and his admin. were behind 9/11. That would give a democratic nominee a good 90% chance to be our next president.
So if there is such powerful evidence that 9/11 was set up and Bush was involved, then why is no one going for it?
The reality behind this all is even if there were powerful enough evidence to make a case out of it. With all of the sheep following this loose change belief it would give at least a 20% jump in a democratic possible president in 2008....
So why is no one even trying to present the case to the courts?
I am askng this question again because no one seems to be able to answer it.
2007-03-22 10:53:05 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No one can answer it.
If any American caused 9/11, it was Bill Clinton, having fun & games and not being a president.
Sandy Berger stole & destroyed classified documents to protect Clinton from the 9/11 Commission Investigation.
2007-03-22 10:57:40 · answer #1 · answered by wolf 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Watch what you're asserting approximately that "200 3 hundred and sixty 5 days previous shroud of parchment"; I took an oath to attend to the type against all enemies, remote places and enjoyed ones. I easily have faith in loose speech. those 3 idiots of "loose substitute" have the liberty to declare what they like. smart human beings do now not pay interest to them to boot.
2016-10-19 09:05:53 · answer #2 · answered by dickirson 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Being the wingnuts best evidence is like being the worlds larges virus. It's still a virus & still too small to see.
2007-03-22 13:52:03 · answer #3 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because most all of them are in on IT
2007-03-22 11:00:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I will answer it for you,,,Because it's NOT TRUE !!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-03-22 19:46:20 · answer #5 · answered by g_man 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋