Which sentence structure would sound better?

Question

..., nor for nothing, for we find the lack of absence….
Or:
…, nor for nothing, but that we find the lack of absence….
I’m asking because there is a question of –style for usage.
For instance, which conjoined structure sounds better? Spoken? Written?
…cutting rainforest to grow sugar-cane and high-cellulose-hemp-species as an ethanol supply will not reduce atmospheric carbon, for we know that an amount of the carbon-dioxide rainforests remove from the atmosphere ends up sediments in swampy sections and turn to coal, which is not atmospheric carbon gas and instead is rock (unless you burn it and put it back in the atmosphere!)….
Or:
…carbon-dioxide, alone, is transparent to the human eye, how will we, the independent voter, nearly 70% of the USA-Voter-Population, know of the corruption in the carbon-trapping-businesses, but that we will be trusting the power companies and others, to monitor themselves for carbon-dioxide rising from smoke stacks as transparent as the sky behind….

Answer 1

1. …, nor for nothing, but that we find the lack of absence…. flows slightly better but is still weird.

2. Why do you have such a long sentence? Break it up.

Answer 2

Its no question that they get alongside splendidly. reliable hearts, loving personalities, and massive expectancies are in basic terms some characteristics which will nicely be utilized to describe ____ and _____. temporarily, (the two use they, or the characters names), are very comparable, yet, they have adequate contrariety to stay their very own human beings.

Answer 3

the last one has too many commas, it sounds like the person is out of breath after running a marathon :P

Answer 4

Break them up. You don't need to say it all in one sentence.

Answer 5

what does grammar have to do with science and math?