Why shouldn't there be? Everyone has listed the obvious reasons but i would like to touch on one wrong one.
I want my ¡OLD! mtv said
"2: The guys can train until they're tired. For the girls if they train too much they can severely mess up their "cycle" or in extreme cases even become infertile."
Women can train just as much as men. It is true that if your % of body fat drops too low you cycle can be interrupted or stopped. But it has no bearing on how much a woman can train if its her choice to do so.
Obviously the physiology of men gives them a great advantage over women in basketball, and teams pay players who have greater advantages over other players.
2007-03-22 19:19:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jessie 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The guys have a lot of physical advantages over women so it'd end up being really unfair.
Here's a brief list of why the guys are stronger than girls:
#1: From raw genetics guys are simply able to do better in sports. This is why say, the world records in sports like track & field and olympic swimming are better for the guys than they are for the girls.
#2: The guys can train until they're tired. For the girls if they train too much they can severly mess up their "cycle" or in extreme cases even bcome infertile.
#3: Guys also have an average height advantage over girls. A male guard in the NBA could be as tall as a female center in the WNBA.
2007-03-22 10:11:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by I want my *old* MTV 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because it is not possible. Ever watch a WNBA game so much slower then an NBA game, A NBA game is more physical and therefor more strength so it is good there's a WNBA but it would never work integrating females into the NBA. Except for maybe as a referee
2007-03-22 10:10:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Have you lost your mind? Mixing the WNBA and the NBA. That is the stupidest thing that I have ever heard. The WNBA is a joke of a league anyway. Placing women against men on a basketball court would be the end of professional basketball as we know it. It already has terrible ratings, because who wants to see a bunch of over paid babies complain about only making 10,000,000 instead of 12,000,000. To quote Sprewell "My family's got to eat." You are a moron for even asking this question, for it even entering your head.
2007-03-26 09:15:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by killerbee213 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
stupid question James are you dumb or what? Would you want to see woman box a man? Same reason you wouldn't want to see a woman play basketball against men, it is not a fair matchup. Basketball is a sport that just doesn't have the potential for women to compete on the same level as the men, neither is football. Of the big 4 North American sports, Football, Baseball, Basketball and Hockey, baseball is the sport that is most likely to ever see a woman ever compete against the men professionally, and that is a longshot. A junkball female pitcher might actually have a shot to compete with the men, because it wouldn't require her to have great arm strength, just good control and location. A woman might be able to have a longshot play goalie in hockey too.
2007-03-22 15:47:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bobby the Brain 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, seem on the sequence, Game four, Cleveland loses through one million factor Game three, Cleveland loses through three aspects (after a three factor shot try close the buzzer) Games one million and a couple of in San Antonio, the Cleveland avid gamers did not have any vigour for a mixture of factors from the lengthy Detroit sequence and the double OT loss, I believe that the Cleveland avid gamers flew into San Antonio worn out at the same time the Spurs had eight days to relaxation up. And, the opposite cause is that as Bill Russell stated, within the NBA, you'll best play one finish of the ground or the opposite, that means that you'll best play mainly offense or safeguard. I believe that LeBron observed this out through gambling Tony Parker in Games One and Two as LeBron became out to be the high-quality defender of Tony Parker; nevertheless, it took such a lot vigour from LeBron that he, LeBron, did not have so much vigour for offense. Games Three and Four, LeBron hardly ever guarded Tony Parker that's what gave LeBron extra vigour in those video games. The Spurs decide upon low scoring video games as their emphasis is safeguard as that's their force. As the Spurs as a crew fritter away so much in their vigour on safeguard, this is the reason the Spurs love to play a sluggish part court docket offense which ties into the speculation that you'll best be aware of both offense or safeguard. The Spurs can run with the high-quality jogging groups within the NBA whilst the Spurs must which they did relatively plenty in Rounds One and Two in opposition to prime scoring Denver and Phoenix. I believe that Cleveland is plenty more potent than what humans believe as looking back, even though LeBron gave Parker probably the most issues whilst LeBron guarded Parker, it used to be a mistake looking back to have LeBron protect Parker because it took clear of LeBron's offense. Games Three and Four made this adjustment clear of LeBron guarding Parker which made a far nearer sport. Plus Games One and Two have been best eight or nine factor victories roughly through the Spurs, so, sure, function through function, the Spurs have been greater than a fit for Cleveland, however I believe that each Cleveland is plenty larger than what they got credit score for within the four-zero sweep at the same time the Spurs are plenty larger than the credit score they acquire.
2016-09-05 12:21:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by threat 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because men would dominate and women would never get in. There is no woman in the WNBA who is better than any guy in the NBA. There's certain things women are better and and certain things men are better at - like basketball.
2007-03-22 10:10:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by shelly 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
by intergendering you mean by putting both females and males in the league...? Now come on now that would just be stupid.... we all know that nobody in the wnba could dunk but lisa leslie... and come on every body in the nba is dominant both in height,power, and skill...
2007-03-22 10:10:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, basketball is just too physical and relies on too much weight being thrown around to be safe.
How about NASCAR ?
NASCAR racing doesn't require any physical contact and
relies on coordination, quick reflexes, and strategy. Women can dominate this sport if they really tried.
(Not like Danica Patrick.)
2007-03-24 14:46:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Whitman Lam 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
inter-gendering would not be a good idea at all. pound for pound men are faster and more importanly stronger than women. they could really cause bodily harm to women, especially at that level. i think most people are in agreement not to inter-gender profressional sports...especially a contact sport such as basketball. maybe volleyball or soccer might work better, but not basketball.
2007-03-22 10:11:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by desireme112 2
·
0⤊
0⤋