English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

IF anybody likes the stupid hair match.....

2007-03-22 10:08:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Over all i actually have to say it is worse. Yea its definatly worse. Nothing can compare to last years hardcore match. The only thing that could have been a LOT better was the RAW main event. It was boring and dragged on and they just had to make Cena win.

2007-03-22 17:54:24 · answer #2 · answered by HBK's #1 Fan (Member Of PAC) 3 · 0 0

worse worse and worse.

first of all there is now speical type of match like hardcore are anything. unless u count the hair vs hair match but then again can bobby and umaga wrestle.

and cena is main eventing wrestlmain for the 3rd year in row. pathetic damn pathectic.

and batista should be a mid carder not main eventer. the only reason he didn't main event last year wm22 was cuz he was injured.


vince loves big people

2007-03-22 17:57:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I would say better. You got two of the biggest legends this industry has ever seen challenging for the titles. You got one of the biggest, if not the biggest, ladder matches in pro wrestling history. You also got a pretty good US title match. Not to forget, a heavily hyped celebrity hair vs hair match to get the mainstream media into it. The undercard could be better, but hell, you can't ask for everything in today's WWE.

2007-03-22 18:10:47 · answer #4 · answered by jm42445 5 · 0 0

Worse. Umaga in the main event compared to Hogan and Rock? Batista compared to Shane o Mac? Lashley compared to Triple H? C'mon, guys. Be realistic.

2007-03-22 17:09:15 · answer #5 · answered by Harry A 6 · 0 0

worse they don't do it like they used to but there r som good mtches on the card but back in the Austin era and The Rock times they were the greatest matches ever



---If Ya Smeeelll!---

2007-03-22 17:09:45 · answer #6 · answered by PrimeTime 3 · 0 0

To be frank, I think Wrestlemania lost its luster years ago. There are too many pay per views now, so WM simply is just another ppv.

2007-03-22 18:28:21 · answer #7 · answered by Tina L 5 · 0 0

worse becuase the wwe has not built up the cena hbk match at all . I wanted to see hbk turn on cena.
Plus they have the tag tittles come on they need to lose them and turn on each other.

2007-03-22 18:09:00 · answer #8 · answered by crazziegrl14 5 · 0 0

It's on equal footing I'd say.

But if you were to take Cena out of the equation, this year would be much better than the last!

2007-03-22 17:07:52 · answer #9 · answered by «G6260» 6 · 0 0

BETTER! Look at this

Womens Championship
Ashley Vs. Melina
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WWE Championship
Cena Vs Micheals
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
well their are more just go to WWE.Com. But i think its just better then maybe past 2 years

2007-03-22 17:09:16 · answer #10 · answered by CrossCut49 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers