Against? I think what you are seeing is a class action phucking. Debt growing out of hand while big business records record profits as they ship their jobs overseas. Automakers, a joke. American plants closing while Toyota builds plants here. Can't American automakers make a decent car comparable to a Camry? When these giant corporations lay off Americans the top management keeps pulling out hundreds of millions a year in compensation. Don't tell me unions are killing these companies. Bank of America catering to illegals, while the banking industry starts writing off the losses from Americans who can't pay their credit card bills and the CEO was compensated to the tune of almost a hundred million last year. Health care up, medicine up, insurance up, energy costs up, food up. I can't think of a single thing that isn't increasing in cost. It's a war and we are losing to Washington D.C. because of special interests and lobbyists.
2007-03-22 10:54:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
If you think the gov't representation is useless, why don't you work on being involved, particularly in politics at the local level is where you would have the most influence. If you don't like employers have a cheap labor pool (even LEGAL), then why don't you go start your own company and pay HIGH WAGES. If you think Americans a being deceived and being tricked into getting lots of debt, then why don't you start a financial counseling agency or debt relief business. There are lots of ways to positively affect yourself, your local community and politics. If you think the situation would be better starting a civil war, you should go study civil war history, start with Camp Anderson.
2007-03-22 11:02:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Someone who cares 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
It sometimes seems we're headed that way, but I don't think it will go that far. The divide between the "Left" and the "Right" seems to be growing ever wider. One side (I won't mention which) seems able and willing to do anything to exploit and undermine the other. This strategy doesn't help. It's been only a little more than 5 years since the terrorist attacks of September 11th, but the two major political parties are clawing at one another worse than two angry cats.
I'm for freedom of speech and like some talk radio analysts and commentators (there's a difference), but this brand of journalism, if that's what you want to call it, only serves to intensity the differences between our two main political parties.
I think things will eventually get better, but I fear they'll grow worse before things begin to improve.
2007-03-22 10:01:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
i'm not likely to jot down an essay, yet i might think of the conservatives might properly win because of the fact militia hierarchy has a tendency to be conservative and conservative civilians, i think of, tend to be extra effective armed than liberals, although neither part is extra dedicated to their reason. If the president have been extra liberal than conservative, i ask your self how the generals and admirals might persist with the orders of their commander in chief. foreign places powers might revel interior the 2nd American Civil conflict and might properly make a contribution to the two aspects so we'd destroy ourselves, and no IEDs could be necessary nor might suicide assaults in any way. i don't think of the two part might have an part in terrain because of the fact the conflict could be fought over the full u . s . in all forms of terrain. i'm no youthful guy, yet i wish my new granddaughter lives to be a humorous previous female and not in any respect properly-knownshows out interior the real international the respond on your question. of direction, neither part might win. One part might purely lose under the different.
2016-10-19 08:58:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, its a shame that there is nothing civil about civil war. Wouldnt people be alot happier if we separated into two parts with liberals and conservatives? Conservatives could pass their laws? Liberals could pass theirs? We dont need to fight each other? And we could still buy each others stuff? Who says that we all have to agree on everything to get what we want?
2007-03-22 10:32:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Discoduck33 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Should have started around 7 years ago but hey thats just what the axis of evil wants another 3rd world country.
2007-03-22 15:13:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by sally sue 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
After we have exhausted attempts to engage the politcial system.
We stand more chance to change the system by taking over the Democratic party and using it to force the changes we want to see.
We need to infiltrate the Democratic party and change it from within. Kick out the corporatists and rebuild America's middle class.
2007-03-22 11:42:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by dharma_bum48326 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Never.... any person(s) who try and cause unrest in the country would be gunned down immediately by gun-toting scary people who swear that every person besides themselves is a terrorist.
People care too much about their belongings- do you really think they will let others try to take it by force?
Um- im going to have to say probably not.
2007-03-22 09:58:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by glorymomof3 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Who's going to participate? The poor who are getting screwed the worst certainly won't. Rent, alcohol, drugs and cable TV are relatively cheap. There's no reason for them to take to the streets and our government will keep it that way at the minimum cost necessary.
2007-03-22 10:08:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I hope it will be soon or there won't be any thing left to fight over, it will all be in Israel ,and what they don't want they will
give to their brothers in Russia, think about it who have they given so many of our secrets to in the last 40 years?
2007-03-22 09:59:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by james w 3
·
1⤊
1⤋