Do you think Bush is working with Israel for a surprise attack on Iran?

Question

If so, how far along do you think they are, what is the probability of it actually occurring, and what do you think the results will be?

Answer 1

I hope not ,I am an Iranian and believie to day Iran is not problem for any countries even for Israel , UK &USA have more proble in midel east they must know no body can stop the time.
be carful, many,many people are living out side of Iran ,they love Iran even part of them do not agree with present power in Iran, if Bush or Israel do attack on Iran then more zoon attack will hapen there at the same time( poor people)

Answer 2

I have thought that this might be possible for quite some time. Perhaps having Israel do this would take some of the pressure off of the US. No doubt that it needs to be done. I believe that there would be a lot of flack following this action, but I also believe it would relieve a lot of people if Iran is not a nuclear power.

Answer 3

I believe he may not be guilty of this one, if so, I think the American people would make him wish he hadn't.

The reason I say this is because of Bible Prophecy. It's the other way around. Iran & Russia and some Islamic countries will attack Israel. Read Daniel : Chapters 7-12, Persia is Iran. Other Countries it mentions are South is Egypt, North is Russia, East is China, E.U. and Western Countries are West. There will be a Nuclear war.
The last two standing to fight will be The E.U., this includes the U.S.A. and China..

The end results will be a war fought between evil and good & that is The Battle Of Armageddon. After, A new Heaven and a new Earth will be brought down to Jerusalem were we will live forever and ever. No more wars, no more suffering, no more pain. This is the everlasting peace, peace that God makes not man!

Answer 4

As a contingency plan - YES
If Israel doesn't have a better
Minister of Defence than last year's screw up - it will be a fiasco. It is unfortunate that the quality of Leadership in the USA and Israel has sunk to new lows.

Answer 5

No. Don't be sucked in by urban BS. If WE, the U.S., are planning on attacking Iran we will do intentionally w/o Israel help.

Answer 6

I think we wil attack Iran's nuclear sites, missile sites & maybe their leaders from the air, maybe cruise missiles. Israel will only be involved in gathering intel.

Answer 7

they are franticlly burning and shredding 7 years of vile evil lies ,note the private contracter of choice is moving all thier paper trail to another land /law juristiction in dubai?
hard to read all the collusions but moving lock stock and head quaters to foreign shores will hide the evidence of colluded treasonous acts in legal limbo
how about the statute of limitations
presedentail pardon
evil is so thourough ,govt is corrupted /exposed in all its workings
they will talk but not allow it to be recoprded nor reported nor come backl a second time
they got a lot of spin to hide
who knows what the response will be
how much jail enron ripp offs get ?
see the joke

Answer 8

No, bush has not been successful in attacks outside the U.S. so his next attack is going to be Vermont..

Answer 9

Were trying to make peace, not attack, but it's kind of hard to make peace when you have a bunch of guys blowing themsevles up to kill a bunch of people.

Answer 10

Iran is in a heap of trouble.....

Iran is dealing with two issues. First, Iran has captured 15 British sailors. Second, Iran has refused to cooperate with the U.N. regarding cessation of uranium enrichment.

Military confrontation may be on the horizon.
http://www.debka.com/headline.php?hid=3961
In addition to the British naval vessels at the Diego Garcia atoll in the Indian ocean, there is a multi-national force in the Persian Gulf. The British HMS Cornwall aircraft carrier strike group, the American aircraft carrier strike group Bremerton-based aircraft carrier CVN-74 John C. Stennis, the American aircraft carrier strike group USS Dwight D. Eisenhower and the French nuclear carrier Charles de Gaulle and its task force are all in close appoximation in the Persian Gulf. The USS Nimitz may also be in the Persian Gulf as it was scheduled for its WESTPAC07 deployment to replace the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/agency/navy/batgru-68.htm

More details about military options can be found here:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/iran-strikes.htm

Iran has elicited "confessions" from the 15 British sailors they captured and may put them on trial for espionage. The penalty for espionage in Iran is death.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article1563877.ece
“If it is proven that they deliberately entered Iranian territory, they will be charged with espionage. If that is proven, they can expect a very serious penalty since according to Iranian law, espionage is one of the most serious offences.” Espionage carries a death sentence.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6493391.stm
Iran's detention of 15 Royal Navy personnel is "unjustified and wrong", Prime Minister Tony Blair has said. UK officials are waiting to be granted access to the HMS Cornwall staff, who were seized on Friday, and have not been told where the group are held.

"It simply is not true that they went into Iranian territorial waters and I hope the Iranian government understands how fundamental an issue this is for us," Mr Blair said.

"We have certainly sent the message back to them very clearly indeed. They should not be under any doubt at all about how seriously we regard this act, which is unjustified and wrong."

On March 23, 2007, U.S. and British officials said a boarding party from the frigate HMS Cornwall was seized about during a routine inspection of a merchant ship inside Iraqi territorial waters near the disputed Shatt al-Arab waterway.

The seizure of two Royal Navy inflatable boats took place just outside the mouth of the Shatt al-Arab waterway, a 125-mile channel dividing Iraq from Iran. Its name means Arab Coastline in Arabic, and Iranians call it Arvandrud - Persian for Arvand River. A 1975 treaty recognized the middle of the waterway as the border.

Iranians send arms to Iraqi extremists, including sophisticated roadside bombs. This week, two commanders of an Iraqi Shiite militia told The Associated Press in Baghdad that hundreds of Iraqi Shiites had crossed into Iran for training by the elite Quds force, a branch of Iran's Revolutionary Guard thought to have trained Hezbollah guerrillas in Lebanon.

Regarding enrichment of uranium, Iranian President Mahmaoud Ahmadinejad abruptly cancelled his appearance before the U.N. security council and in his stead, Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki Iran spoke. He indicated that Iran was willing to continue negotiations but without the precondition that uranium enrichment must be halted.

Mottaki said, "the world has two options to proceed on the nuclear issue: continued negotiations or confrontation. Choosing the path of confrontation ... will have its own consequences. "
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070325/D8O3E7J00.html

The U.N. security council unanimously voted to expand sanctions on March 24, 2007.

The new resolution 1747 calls on Iran to comply fully with all previous UN resolutions and join negotiations to reach agreement so as to restore international confidence in the peaceful nature of its nuclear program. Full transparency and cooperation with the IAEA are required. Suspension of Iran’s banned nuclear activities will elicit the parallel suspension of sanctions. The package of incentives offered Tehran last year for its cooperation remains on the table.

The full text of the draft of resolution 1747 appears at this website:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6455853.stm

Iranians send arms to Iraqi extremists, including sophisticated roadside bombs. This week, two commanders of an Iraqi Shiite militia told The Associated Press in Baghdad that hundreds of Iraqi Shiites had crossed into Iran for training by the elite Quds force, a branch of Iran's Revolutionary Guard thought to have trained Hezbollah guerrillas in Lebanon.