2007-03-22 08:28:10 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Beatles ! Sorry !
2007-03-22 08:36:42 · update #1
The Beatles - no comparison...they composed nearly all of their own songs, did their vocals and played their own instruments. Elvis wasn't much of a musician- was not a lyricist nor a composer..and in my opinion? Somewhat over-rated.
2007-03-22 08:32:49 · answer #1 · answered by svmainus 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The Beatles
2007-03-22 08:40:21 · answer #2 · answered by Enchanted 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Beatles
2007-03-22 08:31:08 · answer #3 · answered by Ron B. 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Beatles.♫
2007-03-22 09:40:15 · answer #4 · answered by Candi Apples 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Beatles.
2007-03-22 08:32:24 · answer #5 · answered by sylvia 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Beatles.
2007-03-22 08:31:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Elvis...but I liked the Beatles too.
2007-03-22 08:31:26 · answer #7 · answered by deb 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well Elvis was first and he led the way for the British invasion to begin. The Beatles came next. So I'm going with Elvis.
2007-03-22 08:31:24 · answer #8 · answered by Marenight 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Elvis,never cared much for the Beetles.
2007-03-22 11:34:23 · answer #9 · answered by CRISTINA S 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Beatles all the way .Elvis was good but he never wrote a song.The Beatles(Lennon and McCartney wrote 99% of their stuff)not only wrote it ,they played better than any group of the time.Elvis struggled with a C chord.Elvis would have maybe 3 good songs per LP whereas the Beatles ...every song was good,even Ringo's.
Also ,they are one of the only groups to have alternating lead singers.Although John wanted to be the "Guy" Paul certainly could out sing him and George could hold his own.Ringo was cute and cuddly.but not much of a singer.
2007-03-22 08:33:59 · answer #10 · answered by AngelsFan 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋