I mean aren't they 2 like totally the OPPOSITE? Hitler was a dictator who invaded other countries to TAKE OVER them...Bush does the same but to FREE them from terrible DICTATORS
2007-03-22 07:48:06 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
They think if they say it enough times, people will start to take it as a truth. That is the strategy of all of their "facts" such as, "war for oil" (no facts), "bush lied" (no facts), "bush stole the election(s)" (opposite of facts), etc.... Yet, liberals all claim the above, and expect people to consider it an obvious.
2007-03-22 07:52:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 3⤋
It seems the liberals hate Bush so intently there is nothing too bad to say about him.
I am liking Bush less every day, but I find this question offensive to the survivors of Hitler's camps.
By comparing ANYTHING currently happening in the USA to the atrocities of Nazi Germany is to undermine the Hell of the concentrations camps, gas chambers and mass graves!
Even if Abu Ghraib was part of Bush's plan, the cruelty there paled in comparison to Auschwitz!
Hey LIBERALS - Stick to facts. By making such ridiculous comparisons, you lose an opportunity to share REAL, VALID complaints.
2007-03-23 07:54:44 · answer #2 · answered by Smart Kat 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because the liberals will lie and say ANYTHING to try and make him look bad. The liberals are more like Hitler than Bush ever was. Can you remember when Gore's wife did the CD burning? It was exactly like when Hitler did his book burning.
2007-03-22 10:42:12 · answer #3 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hitler is the worse person they can think of, but Hitler was a Socialist, like many Democrats...one thing most Liberals forget is that Hitler was very, very, very, very, popular in Germany, almost until the end...
2007-03-22 08:12:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
you could constantly tell once you're dealing with someone of constrained mind while they commence comparing every physique to Hitler. it incredibly is only the Chimpanzee area of the concepts at artwork.
2016-10-01 08:14:36 · answer #5 · answered by celia 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
bush is compared to hitler because of similarities.
invading country that did not attack us and was not a serious threat.
using propaganda to influence public opinion and to deter/punish detractors.(dixie chicks, you love the terrorists, why do you hate america, if you are not for us then you are against us, valerie plame, many others)
guantanamo , abu graib-- concentration camps (locking up people with no charges against them, torture)
BTW, freeing the iraqi people was a reason for the war that came along well after we had invaded and didnt find any WMD's. it is one of many after-the-fact reasons.
i know that comparing bush and hitler is an exaggeration, but i am just giving you the answer that you asked for.
2007-03-22 08:07:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Because liberals failed history and are using words they have no idea what they mean but it instills a response.
A large negative one but still a response.
There is no way you can compare the two and be rational about it.
2007-03-22 08:52:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Iraq is Free? Tell that to the Iraqis, they don't seem to have figured that out yet. They think we have occupied them.
2007-03-22 19:03:57 · answer #8 · answered by barringtonbreathesagain 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because if they keep spewing hateful rhetoric, they can continue to avoid real issues.
2007-03-23 05:16:58 · answer #9 · answered by dsl67 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because Hitler also believed that corporations should rule the land instead of representatives of the people`s will in the form of government. Prescott Bush (grandfather) was a major contributor to the Nazi party, maybe he taught Jr. some things.
2007-03-22 07:54:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 6⤋