Your opinions are appreciated. Thanks
2007-03-22 07:23:23 · 3 answers · asked by remy 5 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Well...I just read Between Past and Future and I gotta say that I found her theories to be pretty hard to grasp. I had a hard time (well harder than most philosophers) extracting the essence of her political views. Her ideas of 'authority' and devaluing of the free will as 'freedom' was troubling to me. While she was against violence, her affinity for Roman authority seemed to me to be a bit tyrannical.
I just read through it once though, I need to go back and read it few more times because at so many places it seemed like she contradicted herself.
2007-03-22 09:04:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Never head of her
2007-03-22 14:30:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NOT MUCH
2007-03-22 14:29:47 · answer #3 · answered by Bettee62 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋