Um, considering the fact that the BBC itself has admitted to bias....I don't really give a ****!
Have a nice day. Oh, and be sure to thank an American soldier the next time you see one, since you're not writing this in German....
2007-03-22 06:32:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jadis 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
First of all, as other posters pointed out, there is the strong possibility that those hijackers found 'alive' may simply be people with similar or identical names. (There are approximately 1 billion Muslims in the world, many in middle east countries where you'd expect some names to be common.
Secondly, did you actually look at the date on the article you referenced? It was published only weeks after 9/11. Did it occur to you that perhaps the FBI, CIA and any other intelligence organization may still be in the process of investigating the hijackers and verifying their identities, and reporting them as 'alive' may be jumping the gun?
Lastly, put your brain in gear and consider what you're saying... al Qaeda has admitted these were the hijackers. If you are suggesting there is some big master 'conspiracy', why exactly would they pick the identities of still-living people? If the conspiracy were so powerful, why could they not create fake identities, or at least make sure all hijackers were actually killed?
2007-03-22 07:02:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by segnosaur 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
That's got to be the worst attempt at American baiting I've seen in a long time on here. Next time you provide a link to back up your "evidence" please read it more carefully.
Einstein, wipe the drool from your mouth and follow my lead.
The link you provided is from 12 days after the attacks. A lot of the information that was coming in was new, unchecked, and needed to be sorted out. At that time, the U.S. didn't know who all of the hijackers were, but they had an initial list of potential suspects.
After they had gotten better information, checked their sources, and made sure, they came up with a final list of who were really the hijackers, most of whom initially were who they thought they were, but not all of them. I assure you that none of the 19 hijackers that are listed now as such are alive.
Now it's time to turn off your computer, put on your pajamas for bedtime, and ask you mommy and daddy if they can change your diaper and wipe off the filth from your wretched, rash infested cheeks that you so commonly refer to as your rear end. Better make sure they know which end is up though. With the looks of you though, they may be powdering your face instead.
Oh, and don't forget to say a prayer for Bin Laden before you lay down to bed. You know he's your favorite, as do we.
2007-03-24 21:22:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by AZ 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
wow, everyone is demonstrating some intense hostility towards you. but yes i have read and watched multiple stories about this particularly disturbing subject. more than half of the alleged terrorist are still alive, some are teachers and pilots, one of the alleged hijackers was deceased in the year 2000.
it has also been brought up that none of the hijackers were listed on any of the planes manifest. if all of this is true which it appears to be, it should raise some very interesting questions for the open-minded freethinkers who like to question and engage in open duologue.
2007-03-22 08:51:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by "GoSANE" 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
I have to ask did you actually read it or just the first line? All it shows, and all the BBC has ever claimed, is that the hijackers were using assumed names, names they acquired from real people. It has never been claimed that those in the report were actually the hijackers, just that they had had their identities stolen. Not even close. Read your own sources before coming out with dumb questions.
2007-03-22 06:42:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Elizabeth Howard 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I use to think that BBC was a good news organizations.
Until that report.
Now I know they have jump into the fanasty reporting of consparcy theories and land of make believe.
I now put the BBC on the same level as the Midnight Star.
You know that paper that shows where bat boy is living in a lab somewhere.
2007-03-22 06:35:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
That is a lie and you know it. Propaganda to the core. What country are you from ? Too afraid to say ?? Americans are not dumb. When you point one finger at us, there are three fingers pointing back at you. If your from Britain, you should be ashamed for using Propaganda against the United States. America helped the British during the war, You must be a young punk ??
2007-03-22 13:11:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Norskeyenta 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why do we fuss so! It is so childish. It does not help to call people names either. Remember also that many believe that your pope wears Easter bonnets, So let's leave the name-calling alone....
And. There is every possibility that the questioner is correct. At this juncture, we don't know what is true or untrue about the events leading up to and including 911. Nor do we know everything about what happened since. It still bothers me that Saudi families were allowed to leave this country so soon after 911.....it will always bother me.
2007-03-22 06:35:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by rare2findd 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Moron that might be relevant, but more than likely not, if that report was not from September 01...how many Arabs have the same name...I bet there is probably two or three hundred Mohamed Attas in the world (Just like the name John Smith...no offense to the John Smith's out there)...I guess it is spring break isn't it?
2007-03-22 06:45:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No! But what I do know is that you're not an American and you need to mind your own goddamned business.
I think it's way past time for America to cut Europe loose. But if we did that, we'd probably just have to come back and save your silly asses the next time you try to kill each other off.
2007-03-22 06:32:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by LittleLamb 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
You didn't read the entire article. It is article about mistaken identity. It appears hijackers used stolen ID. So, they found 'suspects'(quote unquote) alive. Meaning, people who are identified as suspects, not actual suspects you idiot. There was ID mix up.
They put quotation mark around SUSPECTS because they're not actual suspects, but identified as one because ID mix up.
It clearly says FBI is looking into identity of suspects not arresting people who got their ID stolen.
You can't even read entire article and calling people dumb you illiterate crack pot.
My GOD, criminals use stolen IDs? What a surprise!
Please read the whole thing! You dumb dumb.
So, if someone steals your ID and blow up couple of buildings, are you guilty of that crime?
2007-03-23 20:27:52
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋