Who would say that if the US was still under the umbrella of the British Empire it would be 100% better than the sess pit it is today?
2007-03-22 05:19:33 · 15 answers · asked by Imelda C 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
well hrm australia and Canada both are still sorta under british rule..
and i think both of those countries are better nicer places to live
2007-03-22 05:22:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yeah, they've had a great effect on the world.
NOT, taxation, snobbery, intolerance, racism and corruption and paying taxes to a Queen who aint a queen to do absolutely nothing is retarded. Why dont they feed the poor with all the jewels they cant wear?
Images and illusions and that is satanic.
And you sir are a big fool, why do you think Gwashington wanted to kick their butts?
The royal crown murdered Princess Diana, and they are instigating a UN world take over and will place their Satan on the throne of the EU with the chair marked 666.
Anyone who worships a world ruler is worshiping an idol and yes the ten commandments still apply today.
2007-03-22 05:44:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
That quite long placed up feels ever plenty be conscious for be conscious like a decrease and paste interest from some US baby-kisser's speech. I easily have seen your posts right here and there till now : while you're certainly American then you definately do appear like a sort of who thinks there relatively isn't something the country can ever learn from others because of the fact it continuously does each little thing suitable and not in any respect needs to alter its behaviour. a sort of human beings who, because of the fact the invasion of Iraq approached in 2003, spoke out in an intimidatory way against any of your compatriots who had the stunning temerity to criticse your President GWB for what he replaced into doing. united states of america the land of the loose? provided that they don't have a dissenting opinion.
2016-10-19 08:29:33 · answer #3 · answered by thedford 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obviously we need people who live in this land and amongst this people, who feel connected with it all to be the leaders of our government.
While we do culturally have much in common with the U.K., that lack of connection is exactly what led to all those problems back in then 1700's and it would certainly breed problems now. For a simple example, I don't think the English would begin to understand the kind of roads we need out here in the "wild west."
2007-03-22 05:56:50 · answer #4 · answered by daisyk 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was tried once. The British came out second best. Second place doesn't seem too bad except when only two are involved.
2007-03-22 05:28:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I'm American, and though I'm certainly no Bush fan, I don't know if we would be much better off under Blair or under the Royals.
2007-03-22 05:24:48 · answer #6 · answered by tangerine 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Do you still worship at the feet of your sovereign?
When the Queen goes by, do you bow?
2007-03-22 05:34:45 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not a lot of faith in the people's ability to rule eh?
2007-03-22 05:24:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
sess pit?
LMAO!
I can only assume that your 'better education' system failed to teach you the proper spelling of 'cess.'
2007-03-22 05:26:35 · answer #9 · answered by mikehunt29 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No. Religion should never be allowed in government. Especially Christianity or anything it's spawned.
2007-03-22 05:23:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋