PLEASE!!!!!!!! I want to understand the libs on this global warming BULL.?

Question

Why would anyone belive this? Do libs just jump on any bus that runs by? Al Gore? Why listen to this chipmunk? He invented the internet so you could do your own research. By the way I need a 4 million $ grant to look into the possible problem blenders are causing on the rotation of our planet.This could be a very big problem causing the earth to slow down or speed up its rotation.(Depending on the direction that the blades spin).

Answer 1

They believe him because he made a movie about Global Warming. A fictional movie but a movie nonetheless.
They also love and adore Michael Moore for his little movie too. They love and idolize anyone against the Republican Party. They are flocking to Rosie right now....enough said. LOL

He spent $30,000.00 in energy bills last year. Gore doesn't believe his own lectures either.

Answer 2

I think this issue more than any issue disproves any credibility that conservatives could have critical thinking capabilities.

To believe in global warming takes first the ability to put two and two together and see that yes we make an impact on our environment and it doesn't take all the top world scientists to prove this...go and visit a freakin land fill or visit a town near a toxic waste plant.
Secondly, to be open to the issue of global warming actually requires being a decent human being, one that respects the beautiful planet we inhabit whether you believe that god gave it to you, or that we evolved from it, it is still ours to take care of.
Lastly, it is probably very threatening that someone from the "liberal" side of politics actually stands for and believes in something and is trying to find innovative ways of turning it into something beneficial for the U.S) and since we haven't had that kind of example of a politician in a LONG LONG time(and especially from the right, it is probably a hard concept for the "rigid right" to grasp.

You have two choices 1) continue to live in the mindset of the oblivion masses; keep driving your toxic gas guzzling vehicles, eat hormone injected meats and dairy products,and keep supporting huge corporations that pollute your air and give you cancer in the name of the bottom line...
or 2) you can be a decent human being, have some control over your own life, and take some small personal actions like walk sometimes instead of drive (good for the body good for the air, recycle, eat organic or local produce, create compost, and use twisty light bulbs and other "green" products.

It is a simple choice and not one about left or right, but one about personal accountability in regards to our impact on our community and our globe and being a decent person vs. being a mindless sheep with no sense of personal accountability to the world in which we live in.

Answer 3

Scientist to the Left persons Scientist to the main magnificent persons Al Gore at the back of us bawling and plundering “CO2 will kill us all” “No it’s a scam to deliver our fall” “An inconvenient reality I call” somebody’s mendacity to us. forward the mushroom brigade stored on the hours of darkness and dismayed Rants and raves are performed ad infinitum divisive. There is going the mushroom brigade somebody has lied they suggested we could take an element and combat although have been nonetheless clueless. Scientist to the left of them Scientist to the main magnificent of all of them attempt to control them. for their very own motives. a scientific end without a consensus is merely an opinion. data do not lie yet while scientist can not agree than data might desire to be lacking or they might agree. there is yet another threat as nicely. somebody could be mendacity. If we've the data yet scientist can not agree than somebody is mendacity. in spite of everything without a consensus of scientist their conclusions advise not something. We the two lack the understanding to make a selection or somebody is attempting to control us. Take your %. yet detrimentally changing the worlds coverage in keeping with a comparatively disputed end is irresponsible interior the extreme. i'm not taking an element right here because of fact there are no facets in genuine technological information. There are in basic terms data. If curiously that there are facets than the data are in dispute and can desire to not be data because data can't be disputed.

Answer 4

Here you go, Einstein.

http://www.northsoutheastwest.org/issues/natural-environment-1/

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2337023.stm

P.S. I've never seen An Inconvenient Truth or listened to Al Gore.

Answer 5

Speaking of jumping on buses

We all know that had this been a republican idea
you'd be in the front seat

Now regarding global warming

STICK YOUR HEAD OUT THE WINDOW-------DUH

You don't need a weatherman to tell which way the wind blows

Answer 6

So are you saying that President Bush is lying about Global Warming?

Answer 7

Someone told them a committee of scientists thought man was 90% likely to have caused some of the warming...

Everyone knows "science" can only be interpretted by scientists...

Answer 8

When the Earth can no longer sustain us, because of pollution and global warming, you, your kin and your entire lineage won't exist...

Now that I think about it maybe that would be a good thing?

Answer 9

When you write the question like that, it's fairly clear that no understanding is intended nor desired, so why would I bother?

Answer 10

You conservatives have made global warming a much bigger issue than any liberal has. It's not nearly the political weapon to us that it is to you. So I guess I have to wonder why it offends you so much. No one says, "ALL CONSERVATIVES ARE DESTROYING THE EARTH!!!!" but that's how you act.