When you were 1st lady - you tried to address but, did not have any facts about Health Care & recently speaking about Universal HC you neglected to mention it causes income taxes to go up, higher admin costs, most seniors would not be covered, etc. Now you are telling us the oil companies would be willing to let you have their extra profits(?) for you to spend on energy research. Where would you begin and what would your agenda be? I think you should also explain your time in the White House and all the stories of purgery, abuse-of-power, Lewinsky, document shredding just to name a few. You want us to make you the Commander-In-Chief of the western world, tell us on what basis to you think you deserve this privilage. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter.
2007-03-22 04:42:30 · 6 answers · asked by LindaAnn 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
OH MY GOODNESS!!! Thank you for asking this question. I doubt you'll get any real answers because her focus is on fixing her image and not of fixing our government.
2007-03-22 05:15:52 · answer #1 · answered by Stealth 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
There is plenty of information available about her healthcare position, surely much much more than any other candidate you can name.
As far as revisiting "stories of (sic) purgery, abuse-of power, Lewinsky", hello?
We already spent 30 million investigating all of that thanks to Henry Hyde, Newt Gingrich and the other hypocritical, adulterous Repub politicos of the 90's. Do you remember somebody called Ken Starr?
The whole thing came to nothing and was politically motivated by a bunch of corrupt Republicans.
So why should Hillary even address that?
Why not ask McCain for an extensive comment about the Keating Five?
2007-03-22 11:59:57 · answer #2 · answered by celticexpress 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
She don't want a chart.
She wanted a solution to solve the misery of living human kind in planet of apes.
Any good solution you have you can reach out and extend her a helping hands in cleaning the mess out there for the good of mankind in planet of apes.
2007-03-22 11:49:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Good luck, but I doubt that she's willing to answer or even talk to the 'common' people.
2007-03-22 11:46:58 · answer #4 · answered by jack w 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I'm sure she's feverishly typing her response. And I'm sure anything she could say would convince you to vote for her.
2007-03-22 11:48:02 · answer #5 · answered by Crabboy4 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
amen
2007-03-22 11:50:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋