why is tna better then wwe?

Question

because we have actual wrestling and good ppv. tna is for real wrestling fans. wwe glory days are behind them now they have two of the worst god forsaken wrestlers cena and batista as champions, they have the same **** every week. cena has been champion for most of the past two years because hes vinces golden boy its freakin stale now. the majority of wwe fans are idiot marks who know nothing about wrestling. wwe pushes garbage like cena and batista because vince has a thing for steroid abusing body builders. they had k fed vs cena???wtf that was gay and now they are having vince vs donald at wm 23? u idiots are gonna pay 50 bucks to see who gets there head shaved? and they had to put austin in the match because they know the match is gonna suck so they put austin [whos my fave] in the match to get ratings,. and wwe ppv buy rates are down sooo much they had to stop brand exclusive ppv. wwe is dying tna is the future

Answer 1

Like i said before, tna is better than wwe in some ways. but wwe is better than tna in ALOT of ways.
like tna is too fast paced, they dont give enough time for their storylines to develop before they end them.
wwe has had the same two champions for about two years now and its REALY boring. wwe just needs DIFFERENT creative writers thats all!!!

Answer 2

I would agree that for now WWE glory days are behind them. Part of the reason I stopped watching wrestling was because the quality of wrestling went down after they split the roster up. They never used the ECW right, and they always used the lightweights wrong. Basically why WWE fans keep watching it is the past, and the hope that the future will one day again be like the past. They still have the ability to great matches, but the split of the roster works against them doing as many as they used to. I hate the WWE title belt. I have been a big fan of rap, but that is the worst belt I have ever seen. Could go on, but I will stop there.

With all that said WWE is still better than TNA. I like TNA. They are good for the industry. Gimmick matches are already old. People want to see good chain wrestling, and then have speciality matches added on to it. Why the hell did TNA have people wrestling on a X that raised over the ring? Why was Samoe Joe in a X division match? He's like 275lbs and the X division weight limit is around 225lbs. TNA has had some pretty stupid stuff too. That tag team that dressed in penis costumes. The Johnson's or the *****. Why are they bringing back Raven's flock?

I think both companies have issues. With the roster they have WWE is not going to get any better until they put the roster back together, and recreate a tag team division. Two tag team champions, zero great teams, and like four teams total.

I just got back to watching both. I hope they both improve. I would love to see another period of having Monday night rating wars.

Answer 3

Exactly. I love TNA, because they can show me what I want to see: WRESTLING! I admit that they cannot show many matches at iMPACT, but that is a show of 45 minutes, and 12 minutes wrestling are at least a third. It is hard to show more wrestling there, because they have to continue enough storylines to fill a PPV in 3 hours a month. But you can see many good matches at the PPVs, and Russo will, when he works together with an old-school-booker, be able to help TNA. Not everything he does is good, but he is not as bad as many people say. The smarks just forget that TNA must increase their fanbase, so they have to do some storylines. But if iMPACT has 2 hours, they can show both. It is amazing what TNA has done in 5 years of existence. They are the future, but of course, they need some time to persuade the WWE fans that a wrestler does not need to look like a roided monster. This is an illusion that McMahon has built over the last decades, and that has cost many lifes. If the fans see what a normal-sized man like AJ Styles can do in the ring, they will be persuaded. TNA will become a competitor for WWE in the next years, and they will win.

Answer 4

Boy aren't you a homer. Stop acting like WWE can't do no right and TNA can't do no wrong. TNA has actual wrestling? Yea, on Impact each week, you can ACTUALLY find about 12 minutes worth of wrestling. KFed Vs Cena!? Oh my Gosh, WWE using a celebrity in the ring?! WHAT IN THE WORLD? Hello, didn't I once see Toby Keith in a TNA ring once? Oh yea, I've also seen A.J. Pierzynski and David Eckstein in TNA rings. By the way, how long did Jeff Jarrett hold the NWA TNA title for? Thought so. How much money did you pay to see who would go to heaven a couple of weeks ago between Sting and Abyss? Very nice. Don't try to play with the big boys son, I'll just make you look stupid. One last thing, Vince Russo sucks.

Answer 5

This guy Prime Time sounds like a typical WWE fanboy. He must like to see the same crap week in a week out. Anyone that is watching WWE right now and refuses to accept that the quality has declined is a blind idiotic mark. I watch TNA and WWE and I like things that both have to offer but TNA gives me matches and a wrestling show should be about matches not skits and women doing the same dance routine in the ECW ring every week. Y'all people need to wake up and stop rolling over and taking this crap and acting as if it's ok. Be real about it man and start being a real fan.

Answer 6

there only your fans because the guys where on wwe or the originle E.C.W. and wwe dident have a story line for them and you guys offerd them better money because you dont have jack for super stars exept for rihno Angle christen cage and the dudly boys and jeff hardy came back to his senses and came back to wrestle for a real bissnes and try to get the tag team championships with his brother matt.
your PPV's are **** there only 2 hours lone if that more like 1 hour and a half and impact is 1 hour and all our ppv's and SD Raw and ECW are 3 hours so it's worth watcing.y es I agree cena should not be champ or batasta but that dose not man wwe is bad I thin cena and batista are going to lose there titles at wrestlemani 23 no they have the same **** every week you ****. you dame right im going to pay to see who's going to get there head shaved boulbd because it's not the only match on the PPV.they still have exelent PPV and they put stone cold in it because they knew it was going to be good but now it's going to be exelent.

Answer 7

i think of that storyline smart the WWE is extra effective. They continuously have compelling angles for feuds yet they continuously arise couple of minutes it's time to grant the tournament. Wrestling smart TNA blows the WWE out of the water. TNA's wrestlers have extra in ring skill then a large style of the WWE Superstars. If TNA might concentration extra on having interesting suits and compelling storylines then my usual opinion might exchange.

Answer 8

ya right tna better then wwe??? give me a break. remember when wwe moved raw to thursday. the same night tna was on? wwe slaughterd tna in ratings. and i mean slaughterd. raws rating was around 4.4 while tna sunk to an embarASSing. tell you what tna fans.....when your crappy show gets a rating above an ecw rating(as in above the 1.0 mark without a share) then you can claim to be wwes rival,but until then tna aint scrap.and by the way wwe can put on a carlito vs kenny match and still score higher ratings then stupid tna

Answer 9

What makes you think TNA is better than the WWE? TNA has all the rejects that the WWE let go.

Answer 10

damn straight. and you know what would be excellent if czw and tna and roh merged and they would be unstoppable and would crush wwes old wrinkled a** right into the ground. and right into a casket.