2007-03-22 04:02:48 · 12 answers · asked by TAMMY P 1 in Education & Reference ➔ Words & Wordplay
The correct way is I was not. I am real good at English and grammar related topics. Feel free to ask me whenever you need help with something.
2007-03-22 04:09:14 · answer #1 · answered by carly071 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It has variations. If a relative conjunction(if-then, etc.) is added before the noun and pronoun, it becomes were. Otherwise it is was.
2007-03-22 14:49:02 · answer #2 · answered by TrueWOW 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it depends on how its uesd u know:was1st n 3rd pres.sing indic eg i was not there when the incident happened.were 2nd pres.past indic.eg if u were no full i would have eaten the cake.peace out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
love mandy
2007-03-22 11:20:44 · answer #3 · answered by mandy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The past tense of the verb to be is I was not.
However in if clauses we can use If I were not...
2007-03-22 12:20:29 · answer #4 · answered by Diana S jimmy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's 'I was not' .. I is the singular form, so 'was' is the singular form of the verb 'to be' ; 'were' is the plural so would usually go with they were, we were, you (more than one of you) were .. etc
Cheers x
2007-03-22 11:08:31 · answer #5 · answered by Tattums 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it depends on want u're refering but they all come to the same meaning.but isnt may be prefered
2007-03-22 11:11:25 · answer #6 · answered by saraherah 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on how it's used.
I was not aware of that.
If I were not so tired, I'd dance with you.
.
2007-03-22 11:06:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
I was not.
We were not
2007-03-22 11:07:04 · answer #8 · answered by Bladerunner (Dave) 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
was
2007-03-22 11:23:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
was
2007-03-22 11:06:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋