If homosexuality is found to be genetic?

Question

would you want them to look for a "cure"


personally I don't think it's a disease so no need for a cure.. but what are your thoughts?

There has been some talk lately of a blog by a preacher... he speaks of how they are close to proving homosexuality to be genetic (in sheep) and that in the future people may be able to determine the sexual orientation of their children by simply wearing a patch during pregnancy.. then he goes on talking about abortion of the fetus and that sort of thing for a while... but I found the whole sci-fi (for now) faction of this very interesting and figured I would share :)

p.s. If it is a recessive gene then it can still be genetic guys... and be passed along.. and not be bread out of the gene pool

Answer 1

I agree with you. But it has occurred to me before that those who carry on about it being a choice will simply switch their tactic to preventing "birth defects" when the genetic blueprint on this is completed some day. It's depressing to know there are people with so little humanity in their souls, and claiming to be on God's side at the same time. They will call a genetic variation a defect and a whole new campaign against homosexuals will ensue. The reaction I will be more interested in will be the Vatican's. They have been more friendly towards science than the evangelicals/fundies. I don't think they will call for genetic engineering as those hypocrites will, but they will be caught between a rock and hard place. Should be interesting...

Answer 2

i think of if it have been got here across that homosexuality replaced into genetic, then it would be used against us. We already have a large style of progression that must be made interior the sphere of molecular diagnostics, yet no person desires to handle the moral implications of "taking part in God", and the political arguements that should arise. i replaced into easily analyzing an editorial purely the different day that mentioned they have easily effectively cloned a human embryo, yet you probable won't hear approximately it for years. improvements in technological awareness tend to take a backseat interior the information while in comparison with issues like what Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie are as much as. unhappy, yet real. yet sure, as long as our u . s . nevertheless holds onto that is conservative backbone (which is going to be not straightforward on account that each physique's grow to be extra patriotic on account that 9/11) we can be battling a not straightforward conflict against conservative thinking. because of the fact in the event that they hear that there is a genetic reason for homosexuality, the subsequent ingredient they'll prefer is a "therapy". It occurs with any type of genetic "sickness". If that is not interior the bell curve, then that is "ordinary" and that they like a rationalization why. yet yeah, your thinking is suited.."if homosexuality is genetic, then it would be a ailment, and if that could be a ailment that is cured" and to maximum people who are not scientists, that is how they might think of. yet, a real SCIENTIST is conscious that purely because of the fact some thing is genetic does not make it a ailment. purely like in immunology, purely because of the fact some thing is an immunogen (a foreign places substance to the physique) does not propose that is antigenic (meaning invokes a project or immune reaction). thankfully, we've SCIENTISTS who artwork with DNA and not Joe Schmo off the line. They spend plenty extra time analyzing ethics vs. scientific progression and the pros and cons of each.

Answer 3

There are already significant indications that it's genetic. For example, identical twins were found MUCH more likely to both be gay than fraternal ones.
If the genome research clinches it, then churches will just do what they did when Copernicus and Galileo proved that Earth wasn't at the center of the solar system, or what they do when Carbon-14 dating reveals the age of dinosaur bones, or what they do when the oldest Biblical manuscripts don't match what's in the King James -- they'll stick their fingers in their ears, shake their heads and cry, "Nah, nah, nah."
After which, they'll start look for something else to hate and persecute because, ironic as it sounds, nobody does more persecuting than religious people.

Answer 4

Well, first can people get beyond their emotions to realize that homosexuality is a physiological aberration? By this I mean that in a species of 2 distinct sexes, where procreation of the species depends upon reproduction requiring one of each of the sexes, that members of that species who are born without the desire to procreate with the opposite sex are by definition aberrant.

This is in no way passing any type of judgement upon them, any more than if they were born left-handed or red-headed. It is just an observation of physiological fact that homosexuality is not a trait of species survival.

But even my homosexual friends have said they'd never want their child to be homosexual. And while nobody, or very few fringe people, would say they'd hate a child born homosexual, it should be generally accepted that most parents would not wish it as a preference.

Therefore, if, in the future, one supposes they will be able to isolate genes and possibly develop in-utero gene therapy to prevent homosexuality in the child, then it would be highly likely that parents will opt for this.

And, again, this would not be a judgement against those who are homosexual, but an expression of a parent's desire for a normal child.
-------------------------
Wow. Thumbs down for speaking the truth about human nature? I don't PC or sugar-coat facts - people would opt for normal heterosexual babies if they had the option. That's how people ARE.

Answer 5

I can understand why some would want to be cured. After all, I know that many of them deal with a lot of s**t because of their sexual preference. However, I don't think that it's a disease in need of a cure, either. After all, what people do in the privacy of their own bedrooms doesn't affect others.

Answer 6

I think that that decision would be up to the individual. I personally think that most homosexuals are genetically inclined that way. There are some, however, who I think make a conscious effort to enjoy the affections of the same sex.

Answer 7

It is likely, not in our lifetimes, geneticists will be able to "predetermine" inclinations in much human behavior. Debating the ethics of such actions will be a huge activity in this country, but, we are 3 to 4 generations away from it mattering to the extent this is discussed now.

Answer 8

I believe that freedom should reign! If people want to find a way to stop their children from becoming homosexual, this should be allowed! I personally doubt that a "cure" will be found in the first place but the government should not try to stop this! At the same time the government should not support it by putting huge amounts of money into research and development!

Answer 9

I think the fact that people are so interested in finding the "cause" of homosexuality far more interesting than the actual cause. Homosexuality is harmless behavior that has been going on since time immemorial. Why should anyone concern themselves about it?

Answer 10

Who says it would need a cure?

If one was found who would decide if it should be used the parents of a minor (who may not even know what homosexuality is) or wait until adulthood and let them decide.

If heterosexuality was found to be genetic would you choose to change if there was a "cure" ?