2007-03-22 03:44:43 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Well, the whole thing is a joke. If you take a look at the sexual predator lists, they are filled with people who never touched children or committed rape. I saw a study done recently where less than .5% of the people on the list were actually a danger to society, the rest are just unfairly screwed for life. The lists are a good idea that was turned into a joke. I personally know 3 people on the sexual predetor list, one was put on for public urination a few years back (he was drunk and pissed on the back of a building, cops just drove b and nabbed him). Another was for streaking in college, cops arrested him, he is now labeled a sexual predetor for life.....The other one I know was 14 and had sex with his 14yo g/f, she got pregnant and they were both put on the sexual predetor list for having sex with a minor (i.e. each other), both on the list for life. The whole thing is a joke.
2007-03-22 05:18:42 · answer #1 · answered by Jay 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes our government should have stricter laws. Here let me draft some examples of laws that we need in order to protect our children from sexual predators:
1) If found guilty of sexual abuse to a minor you will first be dragged behind the courthouse and castrated using the lid off a metal can.
2) After castration you will be tied to a stump belly down, butt naked in the middle of a prison recreation yard with Vaseline available to all convicts.
3) After the general prison population has finished with your sorry ***, you will be tied to a post, given no blindfold and executed promptly with one bullet to your sorry head that houses your sick mind.
4) All the above will be carried out within 48 hours of conviction.
5) We will not spend tax dollars to feed, house or treat your sorry *** just so you can be released to commit the crime again.
2007-03-22 04:00:55 · answer #2 · answered by ? 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The first thing they need to do is separate the crimes. To have them all lumped together is wrong there is a difference between someone twenty years old having sex with a sixteen year old. Yes they should be punished but not to the extent of anyone having sex with someone under twelve. If anyone has sex with someone under twelve and there is proof that person should get life. That way they can't keeping doing it until they get caught for murder there is no excuse for these people to be living among children.
2007-03-22 04:04:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes definately. Computer and internet awareness should become addressed the most...... Don't Post where you work live etc. good greif they should have a class before being allowed to get on the internet.
2007-03-22 03:48:32 · answer #4 · answered by blondegirl1472 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes. There are many out there who should not be, and they're preying on our innocent children. First offense should mean life in prison. Too bad for them.
2007-03-22 03:47:22 · answer #5 · answered by Kitten Hood 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why not .. the lws are too easy right now.. I mean all you have to do to get on the list is look.
2007-03-22 03:48:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes. The problem is they do not enforce the ones they have now.
2007-03-22 03:52:13 · answer #7 · answered by Reported for insulting my belief 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes they need to inforce the ones that they have and they need to add the DEATH penalty to it
2007-03-22 03:48:49 · answer #8 · answered by buterflyes69 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
why not enforce the current ones?
2007-03-22 03:47:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋