Stupendous technological advances are increasingly taking over the function and shape of human relationship, Please discuss the impact of this taking into consiseration new developments in biochemistry and ecology. Many thanks for your help.
2007-03-22 03:37:58 · 19 answers · asked by polymath 1 3 in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
Extinction
2007-03-22 03:40:26 · answer #1 · answered by Faith 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
But that stupendous technology still does not have the ability to find meridians. Lots of research is being done though.
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=light+propagation+along+acupuncture+meridians&hl=en&lr=&scoring=r&as_ylo=2002
Our nervous systems have not evolved to deal with the onslaught of emf that is in the ether now. Neither have our livers evolved to deal with all the chemicals and/or sugar they get bombarded with from an ever early age.
Our vision is the same. More and more is seen at an ever younger age and in some cases it is all very unsuitable. Not talking content here but more the speed and intensity of images taken in.
Biopsychologically they have no clue which neurotransmitters are involved in emotions. It is the very beginning of the 21st century and in the UK 1 in 5 (could be 1 in 4, can't remember exactly) suffer from mental heath problems. How many will it be by the year 2107? More and more children have allergies, are ADHD, autistic or Aspergers. It's a sign of the times i believe.
They are not adressing the causes. Only the symptoms:-(
The function of human relationship? The ones that ponder on human relations will go forward. The ones that don't will be fodder for the energy plants of the future. I sincerely hope so :-)
2007-03-22 04:25:46 · answer #2 · answered by Part Time Cynic 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think there will be far less people and we will not have technology as ice ages and flooding and naturaldisasters will cover a lot of the earth. But this wont be a bad thing as there will be plenty resourcs for the people that are there and tey will be happy and have some technology and most of the knowledge we have just now. But I think technology can only go so far and we will never have tehe technology to reach another solar system (unless someone comes to us). I would love to see what it would be like if the whole world switched of all the lights or all the cars orsomething for just one day. And then maybe one week. Only hospitals could be allowed. to use the power.
2007-03-22 03:55:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
at some point humanity is going to have to stop asking
what / who there is to exploit in the future, and start asking our selves what we can do to insure a future.
recognition that technological advances have militaristic and governmental primaries as motivation for global supremacy
rather than global health may be too little, too late.
political morality functioning in expansionistical-developmental marketeering by domination or force or supremacy of resource exploitation can only accelerate international strife and conflict.
rigid religious concepts dividing humanity's spiritual cognition of there many 'gods' into ideology camps compounds and complicates the issues of relationship compatibility.
personally, the likely hood of humanity transitioning smoothly through these humanistic ingredients of international / global health and harmony with earth's environments and ecosystems seems remote.
the resources required to sustain the variations of humanity and it's cultures vis-a-vis are limited, and it will be humanity that capitulates, not nature.
governments and religions will fill the comming years with a history like nothing else the earth has never known.
.
2007-03-22 05:33:32 · answer #4 · answered by olddogwatchin 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If there is one single pointer to our future it is the rapidly expanding human population.
Already over 6 billion and adding a billion every 12 years. (Bear in mind that the population only reached 1 billion in 1850.)
This is a major threat to resources and peaceful co-existence.
War disease and famine will be the major problems with an increasing divide between haves and have nots.
2007-03-22 03:49:05 · answer #5 · answered by George 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Look at our world now to see our future. While it is true there are many amazing scientific and technological advances, we can clearly see how meaningless they are to the great swathe of people living in the slums of the world. Even in rich countries, we see huge differences between people. The future will be great for those behind the gated communities, and will really suck for the rest, who will be mired in a world similar to today's Iraq.
2007-03-22 04:03:59 · answer #6 · answered by Bob M 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
sure, it incredibly is a extreme concern, yet i do no longer think of it helps to make each little thing doom and gloom. we would desire to be certain (as almost as we are able to) how undesirable the subject is and how ultimate to repair it. some issues shall we attempt are: a million. extremely putting extreme investment into option ability investment. this would comprise hi-bred autos, wind, thermal, hydrogen gas cells and of course photograph voltaic. 2. attempt to tutor our childrens that there are different issues in existence to boot purchase greater, using greater and spending greater. tutor them that they proceed to exist a pretty planet and that they'd desire to love that planet deeply so as to care sufficient to have an hassle-free existence type that isn't stress it and the animals on it to the factor of extinction. 3. Use much less ability in our each and on a daily basis lives. walk or journey your motorbike to artwork. purchase close by produce the place ever attainable. substitute issues you no longer prefer for some thing a neighbor has. In return he gets some thing of yours. 4. help strikes that inspire much less exploitation of organic supplies the two at abode and in coming up international places. those are in basic terms some concepts off the genuine of my head. If we had governments and persons who extremely cared approximately this concern and might commit ability to it, shall we arise with an extremely good checklist. concern is we prefer strikes no longer in basic terms lamentations!
2016-10-01 08:00:53 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Scientific estimates are that redheads will be extinct in another 120 years, as the 'ginger gene' is the most recessive human gene still in existance.
2007-03-22 05:58:15 · answer #8 · answered by Insomnia 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
american gov. creating more & more wars, which is a sensible word for massacre. the east will be controlled by the U.S, anyone who disagrees will be lableled a terrorist , guilty before proven innocent, and thrown on a island in a big prison where u r the slaves of the yanks. ,....oh come to think of it thats already happening
2007-03-22 03:46:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
well, if we go vegan and paddle around in canoes a bit more we should just about break even. oh, and if i can find that wkd tape of some cool tunes i lost 10 years ago we would have top music too!! see ya there!?! peace
2007-03-22 03:49:50 · answer #10 · answered by billy bongo 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋