English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Upon reading the news, can someone please explain why we
continue to spend money in Iraq when our Vets cannot get decent medical care and $10.00 blankets to cover their wounded bodies caused of this senseless war, also explain why we continue to spend billions in Iraq when we still have homeless folks from hurricanes, homes to be rebuilded, cities to be cleared, but instead our tax payer dollars are being sent to other countries for their rebuilding then to be blown to bits over and over, but here in our own country when a natural disaster destroys hardly anything is being done about it. I just don't get it. Please if anyone can give me an answer that makes good sense then I think I must need my head examined because again I say " I will never understand how backward
our leaders are and where their heads are, because I see their
heads are stuck in the "sand" literally.

2007-03-22 03:03:09 · 4 answers · asked by M. C 1 in News & Events Current Events

4 answers

because your leaders are getting all the petrol from the country rich in petrol and they can justify new contracts for the weapons production.in case you don't know,your president and his family are the main shareholders in a firm who won the contract to supply weapons for the war in irak;so the longer the war,the more money .........god bless america and watch 9-11 Fahrenheit

2007-03-22 03:42:20 · answer #1 · answered by eugen272000 3 · 0 1

properly the Democrats now administration Congress. they simply exceeded a three trillion greenback funds. and that i'll wager funds to doughnuts it won't stability. i'm not likely to declare Bush and the conflict are not a concern. yet there replaced into already a 6 trillion greenback debt while Clinton took place of work. And ALL of that replaced into Democrat Congress generated. you prefer us out of Iraq? properly so do I. What are your Democrats doing approximately it? do you comprehend why we are spending funds on exports? that is because of the fact there isn't an selection! we can't spend funds at abode if abode does not have something to sell. we can't spend funds at abode while what's made right that's of lesser high quality and extra costly than what you purchase foreign places. the place are the Congressional ideas? it fairly is the place the ideas will might desire to start up in case you prefer government to do some thing. The ideas won't start up interior the White abode. You blame the FED. properly permit me supply you a clue. no person twisted all people's arm to purchase extra abode than they might have sufficient funds. And banks did not carry weapons to human beings's heads to get them to sign ARM loans. you prefer extra regulation? Why type? who're you going to alter? All this telling human beings what they might and might't do feels like extra governmental administration. while what we easily prefer is extra own accountability. if your innovations is all from Stiglitz, he's not telling the full tale.

2016-10-19 08:17:39 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

-----I thought a lot of that money was spent in and on Americans; we did not haul the money to Iraq and set it on fire. The same is true of our space program; we did not pack the money into a missle and fire it off into space. The money was spent here, on us. ---Jim

2007-03-22 03:53:34 · answer #3 · answered by James M 4 · 1 0

I believe the amount is more like 1.3 trillion dollars over the last 4 years.

What a waste.....................

2007-03-22 03:27:28 · answer #4 · answered by Dice 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers