English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

that idiotic hypocrite adopt a baby from russia-why does that idiot have to adopt two babies from the same country bascially? i mean cambodians and veitnamise people look alike who how the heck is there diverse of race?

2007-03-22 00:41:11 · 15 answers · asked by pink 1 in Entertainment & Music Celebrities

15 answers

yeah or maybe stick to the states.. i'm sure there are a lot of babies in her own country that could use a hand as well

but she's a home wrecker so she probably doesn't really care

2007-03-22 00:49:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

how can you call angelina a hypocrite when you are trying to say that cambodia and vietnamese people are the same? they don't even speak the same language! and because to YOU they look the same does not mean that to her they are. why must she adopt from russia? she is helping a child that would otherwise have had a life beyond poverty. why can't people just be happy for the child? who said that everyone that adopts more than one child must adopt from different ethnicities completely? i'm assuming that you've adopted from russia plus another continent otherwise that would make you the hypocrite.

and as for angelina being a homewrecker like i read in a previous comment, unless you know her or brad personally that is still an assumption. it does take 2 to start a relationship does it not? i guess maybe brad wasn't "home" when angelina supposedly "wrecked" it.

and as for the comment about it being a publicity stunt, why don't you check your sources, she donated 300k to nambia for the country taking such good care while she was having her baby and ALL the money from shiloh's pictures went to charity. she donates 1/3 of her income to charaties and not only works as a UN ambassador but for UNHCR as well. is there anyone on this blog that can say that?

ugh, i can't believe people can be so jealous of someone doing so much good. who cares about her past? we all had to grow up.

Petite Blond Baby Girl - well it seems like we have a very different opinion and i will leave it at that, but i just want to know what make you think you are so much better than her, that you get to judge her? nice source btw, it doesn't say anything that you're claiming.

2007-03-22 08:03:46 · answer #2 · answered by chinatoy 1 · 3 1

Look! It is like Angelina Jolie wants to adopt children to avoid pregnancy. Cambodian and Vietnamese people do not look alike. I think Angie wants to adopt so she could take care of those children, who come from a poor country. Angie is probably doing the most sweetest idea. I have no idea what Brad is going to say?

2007-03-22 07:57:45 · answer #3 · answered by elaine.patton 5 · 1 1

I think she has the right to adopt any child from any country! I think it is GREAT that she is doing this, but I do have one question for her. United States has enough child that need homes too, why doesn't she adopt one of these?

2007-03-22 11:58:11 · answer #4 · answered by beaner 3 · 1 0

oh, chinatoy, i couldn't have said it better myself.

people tend to look at what's bad instead of what's good. who cares where the children are from. who cares what her purpose is. who cares what we all think. atleast these kids she adopted will have a chance at a better life, a life that they may not even have a glimpse at if they stay as orphans in their own country. yes, there are orphans and children in need in america. but third world countries do not have the resources to give aid to those in need like the US government is able to provide for americans citizens or immigrants. in america, there's unemployment. if you can't find a job, just as long as you show them you're looking for one, you can claim unemployment. there's welfare. heck, there are shelters. in most poor countries, you have no job, you have no home, then you have no food. it's as simple as that. so these kids are blessed. take everything as a blessing. i hate angelina, too (cuz i love jennifer aniston) but what she's doing, whatever her reasons are, these kids are going to benefit from it.

she's doing it for publicity? well, it's still good. atleast she's doing something to help, with or without cameras.

2007-03-22 08:34:49 · answer #5 · answered by sheilanmanny12 3 · 0 1

good publicity.
watch when the children grow up how messed up they'll be.
people forget how weird Jolie acted just a few years ago
i.e. french kissing her brother, carrying vile of blood in a necklace, suicide attempts when she was young, self proclaimed self mutilator.
she only has been seen in a good light since she "visited" poor countries and adopted children.
can anyone name any real good deed she's done for these countries? other then just getting her picture taken next to poor people? funny how she has camera men there to take "those" pictures, if not for publicity,why? To spread the message that these countries are poor?? It's been widely known for decades.
but when she sold pictures with her and Brad 4 times and her newborn daughter, do you know what she did with the money?? pocketed it.
---------------edited
wow, she donated the money she got from selling pictures of her kid! really chinatoy??
great tax write off.
she never should have exploited her child to begin with.
what about the pictures she sold of her and Brad when they were having an affair??
p.s She spent more than the 300k she donated when she paid the way to get around the "red tape" to have the children she purchased delivered.
I think adoption is great. She should adopt any child she wants but not use it to get a better image. She should have more class and keep it private. Even tho she's famous she could/should have kept it more private and not done so many interviews/photo sessions about it.
She kept it private when it was bad publicity about her affair with a married man. Only interview she gave about that was to deny it, which was a lie. Guess having sex with a married man is private business but not the bond of motherhood.
I am not jealous of her. I only think people should not be respected for publicity to build a better image.

We all have to growing up?? Please, like suicide attempts?
Great mother material for a women raising 4 small children, someone who admits to self mutilation only 5 years ago!
She has a history of drug abuse and mental illness.
I guess puppets do and believe whatever they're told.
-----------------
I never said I'm better than her, I said it's wrong how she's exploiting these children. She's using them as a media tool.
Have you seen other celebrity kids photos constantly being sold?
Tom Cruise's daughter? No
Julia Roberts twins? No
EVEN Britney Spears ,who's a bad mother,doesn't have her kids "interviewed".
For God's sake , Jolie had Pax "interviewed" (with pictures sold "exclusivly"again) 3 days after getting custody.
Everyone judges people, it's life. You judged me when you said I was jealous. So what gives you the right to judge me then? And you also judged the person who called Jolie a homewreaker. So back read toy and don't throw rocks when you live in a glass house.
As for the source not saying anything, back read again : [The exclusive photos, licensed to various magazines around the world...]
I guess you don't know the meaning of exclusive photos..
BTW about your article that's a year old, it just states they're going to give the money to unnamed charity.
Mine are recent, one today's.
See if you CAN read these links, I'm sure you won't understand them.
Stop hacking off other people's answers ,like you did to 3 people in your original post.

2007-03-22 08:02:18 · answer #6 · answered by petiteblondebabygirl 2 · 3 2

Why are you only attacking one person for adopting children? There are millions of other people who engage in adoptions that you may not "approve" of. Why don't you fire at them as well?

2007-03-22 09:30:28 · answer #7 · answered by DawnDavenport 7 · 0 0

Because of who she is there seems to be an opinion that she is allowed to adopt a child from the country of her choice..

2007-03-22 08:02:38 · answer #8 · answered by Bella 7 · 0 2

She's not trying to start another United Nations. She's giving a loving home to babies who wouldn't have one. Who cares where they come from?

2007-03-22 07:55:50 · answer #9 · answered by Debra D 7 · 2 0

she can choose to adopt whereever and whomever she wants; i think she chooses to adopt from that area, because she does a lot of charity work around there and sees the poverty..maybe theres also something personal that keeps her going back that way.

2007-03-22 07:45:47 · answer #10 · answered by PussyCat Doll <3 3 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers