English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

At issue; global warming. We are being told it's caused by CO2. This is simply untrue. Atmospheric CO2 is a result, not a cause, of a warmer climate.Ice cores tell us that in the past earth has had 10-20 times as much carbon dioxide and still gone into a cooling trend. Did the ice ages end because mammoths drove SUVs? The US at several times was tropical and had vast inland seas.BEFORE PEOPLE! One strong possibility is deforestation (rainforests). Think about how much cooler the woods are on a summer day versus a parking lot. Also remember trees remove CO2. If it takes 10 trees 1 day to remove X CO2, how long for 1 tree?Rainforests provide 25 % of the earths oxygen. Forests are being slashed and burned at incomprehensible rates.(110 acres per minute) Imagine 10 Montanas being scorched to dirt EACH YEAR.Not to mention animals and plants,etc. Yet we are being told it's our CO2 that is causing global warming . Who's making the money? Why is the deforestation not in the headlines? more--->

2007-03-21 21:19:44 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

There are more important issues than CO2. One is Di HydroMonoxide. This chemical is so widely used, every person comes in contact with it every day. Its in so many common things that we don't realize - food, homes, work, beverages, schools. Yet if a person were totally immersed in it for longer than 8 minutes,(maybe as few as 1) there is a 0% survival rate. Nobody would live.And yet we hear nothing in the news about DiHydroMonoxide.Thats what we need to worry about( among other things.) But you don't have to believe me. All this information is public. But we are so easily led and manipulated. Put "Dr" in front of someones name and he's telling the truth. We will believe anything if it's presented right. Don't believe me? I may have just done it to you! DiHydroMonoxide ? It's water. Please,Think. We're not sheep. and while you're at it, Google "rainforest destruction". That's some shocking stuff. Let's get Gore on that one.Quick.

2007-03-21 21:21:48 · update #1

I am not saying that the planet is not in a warming trend. There have been warming and cooling trends forever. I am saying that all the facts are not being disclosed , and that the Global Warming /CO2 issue has become a circus which is preaching misleading data and flat out untruths. There is a lot of money being spent which would better serve the environment if used for real issues without any political adgendas involved.

2007-03-22 03:09:41 · update #2

10 answers

To answer your question, Al Gore is paying Al Gore. These carbon offsets that he brags about that make his energy-gobbling mansion supposedly carbon neutral, are being paid by him to a company that he owns. FAT ALBERT IS JUST RUNNING ANOTHER PONZI SCHEME. That's why barbara Boxer (What an idiot!) was in such a fluster when Senator Inholt was trying to bring that up in the hearing yesterday. They don't want that information to get out.

2007-03-22 00:34:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Gore doesn't need any money, he has plenty of his own. He was Vice President for 8 years!

I don't think you know what you are talking about!

forests which use carbon dioxide also contributes to the increase in carbon dioxide.

Most of the light energy from the sun is emitted in wavelengths shorter than 4,000 nanometers (.000004 meters). The heat energy released from the earth, however, is released in wavelengths longer than 4,000 nanometers. Carbon dioxide doesn't absorb the energy from the sun, but it does absorb some of the heat energy released from the earth. When a molecule of carbon dioxide absorbs heat energy, it goes into an excited unstable state. It can become stable again by releasing the energy it absorbed. Some of the released energy will go back to the earth and some will go out into space.

So in effect, carbon dioxide lets the light energy in, but doesn't let all of the heat energy out, similar to a greenhouse.

http://www.pa.msu.edu/sciencet/ask_st/083194.html

2007-03-22 04:40:07 · answer #2 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0 1

It seems the whole world is blaming the U.S. Ironically, The U.N. reported co2 is only 6% of the problem. Alex Jones seems to think it all ties-in with the agenda to take our liberties.

2007-03-22 04:49:24 · answer #3 · answered by ? 2 · 0 0

FOX news this hour had something about Gore having ownership in the very company that he pays his carbon credits to? True?

2007-03-22 04:36:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Al Gore is paying himself, he is the one issuing C02 offsets... although I not know how that could be legal. I do know that Carmen Diaz said that she purchased to fly around and promote global warming. If it was not so sad, it would be funny.

2007-03-22 04:30:05 · answer #5 · answered by Dina W 6 · 2 0

WHO CARES?

Al Gore is a private citizen. I want to know who the heck is paying Karl Rove

2007-03-22 04:42:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The vast right wing conspiracy. They pay him in
restaurant vouchers and gas credits.

2007-03-22 04:23:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Careful. You are using facts, and we know liberals don't like those pesky things.

2007-03-22 04:22:44 · answer #8 · answered by Jon H 5 · 3 0

I don't know, but they sure as hell don't mget thier moneys worth LOLOL

2007-03-22 04:21:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

cantcu -how much do you think he made as VP I tell you what it 's not much!

2007-03-22 04:44:06 · answer #10 · answered by josh m 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers