Why bush had attacked on Iraq ? Any particular reason ?
2007-03-21 20:38:36 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No !! Saddam was a harm for the Iraq only and he was over with what he wanted to do with Iraq......and for that US always backed him ..he was a harm for his surrounding countries as he had fought a war with iran for many years and also attacked Kuwait ......at that time too US backed him and given him all the support..........yet he never threaten US for anything........he was a puppet of American who after being useing him completely executed him! this was a long term planing....started by Georg Bush and finished by Goerg W.bush ! so the son has completed the work of his father....US needed middle east Oil for their economy ! and this is the reason why US attacked Iraq....There is no other particular reason but the reasons which are given are just lame excuses ! This is a fact that America is a safe country and smaller countries like Iraq, iran are not threat to it ! its ridiculous to believe in it even !
2007-03-21 22:05:30 · answer #1 · answered by ★Roshni★ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No Saddam was no worse than Mugabe, does that mean the US go into Africa to suppress his regime. The only reason Bush attacked Iraq was to secure oil for the US and also to finish off what his father didnt do. Iraq was had a small military and it was easy pickings for the bullies in the US. I live in Ireland and have seen bloodshed on the streets of Northern Ireland for over 30 years. The British tried to take over the North of Ireland and failed due to the IRA and their guerilla tactics, similiar to what is happening in Iraq. The Americans will never win the war in Iraq it will go on for many years and will result in all out civil war when they eventually leave, so they should have never gone in there in the first place.
2007-03-22 04:51:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oil!
No other reason! He had nothing to do with 9/11 or Terrorist! He hated terrorist!
And you are right, even the Iraqi's in a poll would rather have Saddam back than America there! They view us worse than they viewed him! That is a powerful statement!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tQeBNjjFbQ&mode=related&search=
2007-03-22 04:09:53 · answer #3 · answered by cantcu 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
America started illegal war against Iraq. They only bought death and destruction for the Iraqis. Looting Iraqi oil money.
Perverted US soldiers made naked human pyramid with Iraqi.
Killed 665000 + or more Iraqi.
2007-03-22 03:54:00 · answer #4 · answered by BushSupporter 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
...lets see if I can shed some light on this for you... try to think of it all like this for a few minuets... You live in a neighborhood...nice area, quiet street and 3 blocks down is a "crack" house and gang-den... (now you've never seen the guys that go in and out) but just 3 blocks down it's a freek'n mess and all the neighbors on "that" block are terrified... even the cops don't go down there...your kids play outside and one of your kids best friends lives on "that-street"... One day your son goes down there to play...have fun and mind his own business with his friend who live on "that-street"... yeah, you get it now...a drive-by goes bad and some kids get cap'd and it's a real mess now... so what do you do... there is your son... shot...handing on to life by a thread and you and you have a 12ga. in your bedroom closet......Saddam was a punk, bully local-gang banging freek-crud to his neighborhood but he was hurt'n others... not us directly but he chipped away at us and our friends... hope this helped a bit...
2007-03-22 03:57:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
No. America was very clearly the agressor. You remmember? Bush and his "intelligenz" had proof of Saddam's weapon of massdestruction and and....
But they couldn't proof anything! America is a very bad, agressiv nation! dangerous!
2007-03-22 03:44:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hitler wasn't a threat.
Germany never attacked us.
The US was the agressor there, too?
Have Libs EVER been on the correct side of an issue.
LOL@ Okieboy!
That was from "back in the day"!
Maybe instead of calling them left wing, we should just start calling them WRONG wing.
2007-03-22 03:51:55 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Who can tell? Now we don't have anyone in the region to oppose the Persians.
2007-03-22 03:41:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, he was a boy scout, a member of the church choir, and a super citizen. Don't you pick up any newspapers ? He was a Violent Bastard who ruled through intimidation and fear, he was a murderer on a HUGE scale, about as high up as you can go, about as high up as you are on the IDIOT scale !
2007-03-22 03:53:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋